Re:JavaScript engines zoo – Compare every JavaScript engine
by gurgunday on Sunday January 04, 2026 @09:54AM
(#46488515)
A significant part of Google’s business (Ads, YouTube, Workspace) runs inside a browser, so if the web is slow, Google loses money
Re:JavaScript engines zoo – Compare every JavaScript engine
by johannes1234321 on Sunday January 04, 2026 @11:28AM
(#46489480)
What are the marginal gains in business for them from the likely improvement of the runtime? It's not like the web (or: web-technology-based apps) don't capture a lot of time already.
Re:JavaScript engines zoo – Compare every JavaScript engine
by Octoth0rpe on Sunday January 04, 2026 @11:07AM
(#46489252)
And the faster that a page finishes rendering on an iphone, the faster that the cpu can idle, which hugely benefits battery life. That's a pretty strong motivation on Apple's side. I don't think the proposed motivation on google's side is stronger.
Re:JavaScript engines zoo – Compare every JavaScript engine
by charcircuit on Sunday January 04, 2026 @09:52AM
(#46488490)
Faster page load times increases engagement with the web. More engagement on the web leads to more engagement with Google's ads.
Re:JavaScript engines zoo – Compare every JavaScript engine
by lionkor on Monday January 05, 2026 @04:58AM
(#46496999)
I don't agree. Page load times do not matter when everything is so locked down that most people don't even know there's an alternative.
Re:JavaScript engines zoo – Compare every JavaScript engine
by aurareturn on Tuesday January 06, 2026 @02:27AM
(#46509645)
But this was always true. True for last 40 years.
What’s changed in 2026 that will motivate Google to overtake JSCore?
What are those incentives? I see no incentive for Google to make something fast.