Re:The C3 Programming Language
by fuzztester on Saturday January 03, 2026 @07:18PM
(#46483338)
Is this the same Ragel that Zed Shaw wrote about in one of his posts back in the day, during Ruby and Rails heydays? I vaguely remwmber that article. I think he used it for Mongrel, his web server.
The worst part of designing a language is the parsing stage.
Simple enough to do it by hand, but there’s a lot of boilerplate and bureaucracy involved that is painfully time-wasting unless you know exactly what syntax you are going for.
But if you adopt a parser-generator such as Flex/Bison you’ll find yourself learning and debugging and obtuse language that has to be forcefully bent to your needs, and I hope your knowledge of parsing theory is up-to-scratch when you’re facing with shift-reduce conflicts or have to decide whether LR or LALR(1) or whatever is most appropriate to your syntax.
Not even PEG is gonna come to your rescue.
Re:The C3 Programming Language
by fuzztester on Friday January 09, 2026 @12:19AM
(#46550320)
how is the boilerplate etc related to the syntax. not clear. i would have thought you first decide the syntax n only then start the work.
but i've never created an interpreter, let alone a compiler.
[1]: https://www.colm.net/open-source/ragel/
[2]: https://github.com/gritzko/librdx/blob/master/rdx/JDR.lex