Re:Finland detains ship and its crew after critical undersea...
by Sabinus on Friday January 02, 2026 @12:15AM
(#46461656)
Imagine Trump threatens to nuke Russia if they don't leave Ukraine tomorrow, according to your logic they shouldn't run the risk of a nuclear exchange and Russia should retreat.
Is this correct?
Re:Finland detains ship and its crew after critical undersea...
by JumpCrisscross on Friday January 02, 2026 @01:36AM
(#46462059)
Spot on. Recognising Putin’s fake lines normalizes a nuclear response to conventional tactics. That path opens to a future where it would be irrational not to constantly threaten nuclear holocaust for minor military advantage. And in that world, someone will eventually miscalculate.
Re:Finland detains ship and its crew after critical undersea...
by mmooss on Friday January 02, 2026 @08:04PM
(#46471621)
And Russia could threaten to nuke the US unless the US surrendered Poland. Obviously, the hypotheticals are absurd and flawed.
Re:Finland detains ship and its crew after critical undersea...
by JumpCrisscross on Friday January 02, 2026 @01:34AM
(#46462040)
> many experts clearly think nuclear war is a risk
Look up what they said would trigger a nuclear war at the start of the invasion. Many of those things have already happened.
Re:Finland detains ship and its crew after critical undersea...
by mmooss on Friday January 02, 2026 @08:01PM
(#46471593)
They said it was a risk. The fact that it didn't happen doesn't disprove that. A 1/100 risk of nuclear war almost certainly wouldn't happen, and would be far too high of a risk.
Also, Biden vary carefully managed that risk by slowing boiling the frog. Too carefully, I thought, but it's reasonable that his overwhelming priority was preventing nuclear war.
That statement doesn't really amount to much given the risk. I think we need something far more convincing; and many experts clearly think nuclear war is a risk.