Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by ruddzw on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @12:46PM
(#464313)
I had the chance to use EtherPad as part of a job interview while it was in private beta. It was supposed to use Skype and EtherPad to get the full effect. Skype broke, but EtherPad worked great. The ease of getting code to the interviewer, and (I imagine) the ability to see the way I wrote the code were really helpful.
If you're doing a phone screen interview in the future, I highly recommend using EtherPad.
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by exfswlkrji on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @03:12PM
(#464565)
It just sits there saying "connecting..."
So does that mean no other user online, or my Javascript is broken, or my net connections is down, or they are slashdotted, or what?
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by aaroniba on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @03:18PM
(#464579)
This probably means there's an incompatibility with your browser/ISP/firewall combination. If you click the "reconnect" button, it will submit diagnostic info to help us debug, or you can mail support @ etherpad.com for help.
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by flatline on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @11:25AM
(#464155)
Looks pretty neat. I'm still trying to find the Emacs keybinding option...More seriously, some basic formatting options may be nice, for actual document production vs., as some others mentioned, a fancy chat system.
My first thought was that a version control repository and editing system could be built on top of this that would actually allow two people to see each others' edits simultaneously but compile only their own revisions until a commit occurred.
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by CalmQuiet on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @12:30PM
(#464278)
It seems to response quite quickly at this point - as quickly as the demo shows in the etherpad.com demo video. Those of you who tried pclark's test/toy link: try signing up and selecting a color for your editing. Pretty slick!
I'm wondering what their business model is? No ads yet. Will this just showcase their hacking abilities?
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by exfswlkrji on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @03:10PM
(#464562)
Corporate versions with security and active directory authentication.
Rich text, images, spreadsheets in a paid-for version.
Branded versions to include in your own site.
Since it generally requires at least two people who need to communicate then at least one of them is likely to be prepared to pay.It's not just an eyeballs=advert web2.0 thing.
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by pg on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @01:41PM
(#464412)
When you want to test out Etherpad and don't already have text you want to edit, you tend to use it like chat. But even then you can do things you can't do with chat, because you can see what the other person is typing and start responding before they finish (like in a real conversation). I've suggested to the Appjets that they might want to make a variant of Etherpad aimed at chat.
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by rokhayakebe on Wednesday February 04, 2009 @01:20AM
(#465336)
That would be great. Plenty times we are required to quickly chat with someone, but we dont want to add them as IM contacts (think interviews). This would be a great solution for one time chats.
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by misuba on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @08:03PM
(#465067)
Strictly speaking, AppJet already supports Comet, but the full support that's used in EtherPad is part of the next major version of the AppJet platform. From the sound of the ITConversations interview linked above, the new platform won't be out until a bit after Enterprise EtherPad.
Re:EtherPad out of private beta
by Tichy on Tuesday February 03, 2009 @05:40PM
(#464845)
The simplicity argument kills the discussion for me. It can't be right that to achieve columness, one has to wade through cascades of ever more esoteric articles explaining how to hack CSS.
If you're doing a phone screen interview in the future, I highly recommend using EtherPad.
But you're right, marketing specifically to software shops could be a good way to make a profit.
Here's a test URL to toy with: http://etherpad.com/qtUr4Iw3mr
I've used Google docs to do collaborative work with people and it's served me pretty well, but Etherpad seems like a solid option.
I think the private, for-pay service in your FaQ sounds like an interesting potential replacement.
Seriously, hire a designer to smooth out your site, it's well worth it.
Please design a new favicon. The current one looks like an ode to mid-nineties shareware sites.
Don't mean to pry, but it'd be cool to know what the original issue was...
My first thought was that a version control repository and editing system could be built on top of this that would actually allow two people to see each others' edits simultaneously but compile only their own revisions until a commit occurred.
http://gobby.0x539.de/trac/
I'm wondering what their business model is? No ads yet. Will this just showcase their hacking abilities?
Since it generally requires at least two people who need to communicate then at least one of them is likely to be prepared to pay.It's not just an eyeballs=advert web2.0 thing.
(seen in a slashdot comment on this page : http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/11/21/1626208 )
However, their site is currently down. And yes, that was an offline app, so etherpad is much better.
I used to prefer this mode, but some of my friends hated it.
It's certainly quite fun, but not sure if it's more useful.
Seriuosly - Excelent job!