News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI by lokar on Friday December 26, 2025 @11:38AM (#46393640)
Ads are extremely computationally cheap
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI by cvwright on Friday December 26, 2025 @01:19PM (#46394637)
But mining all the tracking data in order to show profitable targeted ads is extremely intensive. That’s what kicked off the era of “big data” 15-20 years ago.
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI by giantrobot on Friday December 26, 2025 @03:11PM (#46395706)
Mining tracking data is a megaFLOP and gigaFLOP scale problem while just a simple LLM response is a teraFLOP scale problem. It also tends towards embarrassingly parallel because tracks of multiple users aren't usually interdependent. The tracking data processing also doesn't need to be calculated fresh for every single user with every interaction.

LLMs need to burn significant amounts of power for every inference. They're exponentially more power hungry than searches, database lookups, or even loads from disk.

Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI by DonHopkins on Friday December 26, 2025 @02:58PM (#46395581)
But making good people work on ads instead of something useful has an enormous cost to society.
Re:Rob Pike Goes Nuclear over GenAI by victorbjorklund on Saturday December 27, 2025 @02:14AM (#46399829)
But what is the benefit? And I’m pretty sure there is more than 1 single CPU in the world dedicated to running ads.