Re:The EU's Fine Against X Is Not About Speech or 'Censorship'
by ecshafer on Wednesday December 24, 2025 @10:13AM
(#46376261)
So as opposed to the old twitter method which was a vague “you know someone at twitter”, which led to random “journalists” and nobodies being verified. Paying money is just as arbitrary. Money at least means a credit card transaction happened.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The EU's Fine Against X Is Not About Speech or 'Censorship'
by ceejayoz on Wednesday December 24, 2025 @10:14AM
(#46376281)
An actual human employee at Twitter vouching for someone’s existence seems far more reputable than being able to purchase a Visa gift card in a convenience store.
Verification was “this account is who it says it is”. Not “this account has $10 to spare”.
Re:The EU's Fine Against X Is Not About Speech or 'Censorship'
by surgical_fire on Wednesday December 24, 2025 @11:29AM
(#46376932)
I remember it being just a "good boy" badge.
People routinely had their checkmark removed when they said something controversial.
Re:The EU's Fine Against X Is Not About Speech or 'Censorship'
by myvoiceismypass on Wednesday December 24, 2025 @12:31PM
(#46377460)
> People routinely had their checkmark removed when they said something controversial.
It was not indeed happening "routinely".
https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/15/16658600/twitter-verific...
Re:The EU's Fine Against X Is Not About Speech or 'Censorship'
by surgical_fire on Wednesday December 24, 2025 @05:09PM
(#46379792)
Still something that defeats the purpose, no?
A verification badge should be something that says "this person indeed is who they claim to be" not "they can spend a couple of bucks a month" nor "we like him enough to give them a checkmark". Both are extremely unhelpful. The latter probably even more unhelpful since it is very subjective.
Re:The EU's Fine Against X Is Not About Speech or 'Censorship'
by ceejayoz on Thursday December 25, 2025 @12:01PM
(#46385602)
Verification came with moderation tweaks for high-profile accounts to combat things like brigading via mass abuse reports. That's why consistently bad behavior tended to lose the check.
Probably should've been two different flags, but it wasn't.