Re:Cecot – 60 Minutes
by snowwrestler on Tuesday December 23, 2025 @08:21AM
(#46365129)
I asked last year and was told 404 is the source of too many copycat low quality posts and they have a paywall. In the year since, a bunch of their original reporting has hit the front page and driven interesting discussions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Just to clarify for anyone reading. 404 does not have a paywall. They have an account wall. Some articles require you to be signed into a free account to read.
Re:Cecot – 60 Minutes
by snowwrestler on Tuesday December 23, 2025 @10:39AM
(#46366177)
For comparison, the Wall Street Journal does have a paywall but is not a banned site.
And 404 is also not banned, right?
As a noob here on HN, that's what I gathered from your previous comment:
> In the year since, a bunch of their original reporting has hit the front page
So, a year ago, before my time, 404 media was moderated in a way that seemed like a ban, but now it no longer appears to be shadowbanned, is that what I'm learning?
If a 404media article makes it to the front page, it's because enough people happened to vouch a [dead] article, which is quite unusual and involves a lot of luck (since most people don't have showdead enabled). Nothing has changed on the mod side as far as I'm aware.
Re:Cecot – 60 Minutes
by mrguyorama on Tuesday December 23, 2025 @01:34PM
(#46367883)
Don't forget that complaining about paywalls is actually against the rules. So how did the site get that ban in the first place?