News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Well being in times of algorithms by ivanjermakov on Monday December 22, 2025 @11:13AM (#46355329)
HN (i.e. crowd sourced ranking) is different from algorithm feeds. It doesn't try to show you things to match your interests, feed is the same for all users. This makes a big difference.
Re:Well being in times of algorithms by jayd16 on Monday December 22, 2025 @12:08PM (#46356030)
The real difference is the quality of the moderation. A global feed is terrible if it can be gamed.
Re:Well being in times of algorithms by Aurornis on Monday December 22, 2025 @12:36PM (#46356374)
From the way HN's moderators describe their own actions, there's very little active input to what shows up on the front page.

The stories shown are determined by user input (upvotes and flags). Moderators tend to rescue stories that are excessively flagged and there's also the second-chance queue, but I don't believe they're actively picking winners and losers on the front page.

Also, the HN global feed is heavily gamed. It's very common practice for startups to organize voting rings to front-page their latest blog post or new product announcement. The simple attempts are caught, but it's common information in the startup world about how to organize group voting efforts to tip a story on to the front page without triggering the voting ring detector too much.

Re:Well being in times of algorithms by dkdcio on Monday December 22, 2025 @12:02PM (#46355958)
the HN feed is also an algorithm. YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, etc. also all include “crowd sourced ranking” in their algorithms

the difference is the incentive (what the algorithm is optimized for). in most of these feeds it’s for ad revenue, hence the results