News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Coarse Is Better by yoan9224 on Sunday December 21, 2025 @12:42PM (#46346581)
The author's prompts are fighting against what Nano Banana was optimized for. Saying "British Museum" to MJv2 worked because it blurred all images tagged with museums into the aesthetic. NBP interprets it literally: show me something IN a museum.

This isn't worse - it's different. MJv2 was a happy accident machine. NBP is a precision tool.

If you want the coarse aesthetic, prompt for it: "rough brushstrokes, visible canvas texture, unfinished edges, painterly, loose composition". NBP will give you exactly that because it actually understands what you're asking for.

The real lesson: we're in a transition period where prompting strategies that exploited old model quirks no longer work. That's fine - we just need to adapt our prompting to match what the model was designed to do.

Re:Coarse Is Better by speedgoose on Sunday December 21, 2025 @02:02PM (#46347269)
Thanks ChatGPT. I’m wondering about the motivation to spam HN with LLM generated comments. Not the worst comments though.
Re:Coarse Is Better by flexagoon on Sunday December 21, 2025 @10:19PM (#46350961)
I don't think that comment is LLM generated. I would've certainly written it like that myself.
Re:Coarse Is Better by DrammBA on Monday December 22, 2025 @12:45AM (#46351703)
> It's not X - it's Y, it's Z.

> Consider: consideration. That's what you should consider.

Come on man

Re:Coarse Is Better by flexagoon on Monday December 22, 2025 @07:12AM (#46353540)
The second point I agree with, but I hate that the "It's not ... it's ..." construct is a sign of LLMs now, because I use it all the time
Re:Coarse Is Better by speedgoose on Monday December 22, 2025 @12:59AM (#46351758)
Check the account comments history. A lot of good comments of a similar length posted very closely in time. I don’t think a human can write that well, so quickly, on so many topics.
Re:Coarse Is Better by juggy69 on Sunday December 21, 2025 @11:41PM (#46351358)
Have to agree that is sounds GPT-generated. Why so many colons? And the incurable marketing-speak.