We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM analysis

Re:We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM anal... by jp8585 on Friday December 19, 2025 @05:48PM (#46331878)

Anthropic released 1,250 interviews about AI at work. Their headline: "predominantly positive sentiments." We ran the same interviews through structured LLM analysis, and the true story is a bit different.

  Key findings:                                                                                               
  • 85.7% have unresolved tensions (efficiency vs quality, convenience vs skill)                              
  • Creatives struggle MOST yet adopt FASTEST 
  • Scientists have lowest anxiety despite lowest trust (see ai as a tool, plain and simple)
  • 52% of creatives frame AI through "authenticity" (using it makes them feel like a fraud)

Same data, different lens. Full methodology at bottom of page. Analysis: https://www.playbookatlas.com/research/ai-adoption-explorer Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/AnthropicInterview...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM anal... by Terretta on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:53PM (#46332360)

“Not X. Not Y. Z.” – Are you not willing to edit the tropes out?

Or maybe teach your LLM to fix itself. Starting rule set:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM anal... by hugh-avherald on Friday December 19, 2025 @07:42PM (#46332692)

That is not a definitive test.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM anal... by collinvandyck76 on Friday December 19, 2025 @09:38PM (#46333214)

No, but the whole article felt definitively AI-generated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM anal... by too_root on Friday December 19, 2025 @10:30PM (#46333411)

the entire site feels ai-generated

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM anal... by furyofantares on Friday December 19, 2025 @11:17PM (#46333582)

And then you had it write your post even here on HN. C'mon.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM anal... by jp8585 on Saturday December 20, 2025 @05:24AM (#46335062)

I guess all the interview quotes almost feel like those fake reviews on websites. They are all true excerpts, though. And we had a lot of fun creating all of those interactive bits. I get the sense there's a sort of ai content ptsd here, even some of the replies here are being flagged as ai, lol

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:We ran Anthropic’s interviews through structured LLM anal... by furyofantares on Saturday December 20, 2025 @07:15AM (#46335626)

It's not PTSD, it's that I have no clue what you think of the results of your project here when even your comment on HN introducing it is an infodump that came out of an LLM. I can't tell what you think of the results, if you're skeptical of any of it, or if you think it's a smoking gun, or what. I don't know what parts of it you care more about than others. All I know is what the LLM thinks about the project.

[ Parent | on HN ]