News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by KingMob on Friday December 19, 2025 @03:01AM (#46323385)
Time to create the Torment Nexus, I guess
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by varjag on Friday December 19, 2025 @03:10AM (#46323428)
There's a thriving startup scene in that direction.
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by BiteCode_dev on Friday December 19, 2025 @03:24AM (#46323516)
Wasn't that the elevator pitch for Palentir?

Still can't believe people buy their stock, given that they are the closest thing to a James Bond villain, just because it goes up.

I mean, they are literally called "the stuff Sauron uses to control his evil forces". It's so on the nose it reads like an anime plot.

Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by kbrkbr on Friday December 19, 2025 @04:16AM (#46323816)
Stock buying as a political or ethical statement is not much of a thing. For one the stocks will still be bought by persons with less strung opinions, and secondly it does not lend itself well to virtue signaling.
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by ruszki on Friday December 19, 2025 @05:01AM (#46324062)
I think, meme stocks contradict you.
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by iwontberude on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:01AM (#46324440)
Meme stocks are a symptom of the death of the American dream. Economic malaise leads to unsophisticated risk taking.
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by CamperBob2 on Friday December 19, 2025 @12:35PM (#46328535)
Well, two things lead to unsophisticated risk-taking, right... economic malaise, and unlimited surplus. Both conditions are easy to spot in today's world.
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by iwontberude on Saturday December 20, 2025 @05:48PM (#46340386)
unlimited surplus does not pass the sniff test for me
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by notarobot123 on Friday December 19, 2025 @04:05AM (#46323764)
To the proud contrarian, "the empire did nothing wrong". Maybe Sci-fi has actually played a role in the "memetic desire" of some of the titans of tech who are trying to bring about these worlds more-or-less intentionally. I guess it's not as much of a dystopia if you're on top and its not evil if you think of it as inevitable anyway.
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by psychoslave on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:40AM (#46324713)
I don't know. Walking on everybody's face to climb a human pyramid, one don't make much sincere friends. And one certainly are rightfully going down a spiral of paranoia. There are so many people already on fast track to hate anyone else, if they have social consensus that indeed someone is a freaking bastard which only deserve to die, that's a lot of stress to cope with.

Future is inevitable, but only ignorants of self predictive ability are thinking that what's going to populate future is inevitable.

Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by duskdozer on Friday December 19, 2025 @06:41AM (#46324733)
To be honest, while I'd heard of it over a decade ago and I've read LOTR and I've been paying attention to privacy longer than most, I didn't ever really look into what it did until I started hearing more about it in the past year or two.

But yeah lots of people don't really buy into the idea of their small contribution to a large problem being a problem.

Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by Lerc on Friday December 19, 2025 @07:56AM (#46325300)
>But yeah lots of people don't really buy into the idea of their small contribution to a large problem being a problem.

As an abstract idea I think there is a reasonable argument to be made that the size of any contribution to a problem should be measured as a relative proportion of total influence.

The carbon footprint is a good example, if each individual focuses on reducing their small individual contribution then they could neglect systemic changes that would reduce everyone's contribution to a greater extent.

Any scientist working on a method to remove a problem shouldn't abstain from contributing to the problem while they work.

Or to put it as a catchy phrase. Someone working on a cleaner light source shouldn't have to work in the dark.

Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by duskdozer on Friday December 19, 2025 @08:59AM (#46325915)
>As an abstract idea I think there is a reasonable argument to be made that the size of any contribution to a problem should be measured as a relative proportion of total influence.

Right, I think you have responsibility for your 1/<global population>th (arguably considerably more though, for first-worlders) of the problem. What I see is something like refusal to consider swapping out a two-stroke-engine-powered tungsten lightbulb with an LED of equivalent brightness, CRI, and color temperature, because it won't unilaterally solve the problem.

Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by quesera on Friday December 19, 2025 @09:47AM (#46326432)
> Still can't believe people buy their stock, given that they are the closest thing to a James Bond villain, just because it goes up.

I proudly owned zero shares of Microsoft stock, in the 1980s and 1990s. :)

I own no Palantir today.

It's a Pyrrhic victory, but sometimes that's all you can do.

Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by CamperBob2 on Friday December 19, 2025 @12:32PM (#46328493)
Still can't believe people buy their stock, given that they are the closest thing to a James Bond villain, just because it goes up.

I've been tempted to. "Everything will be terrible if these guys succeed, but at least I'll be rich. If they fail I'll lose money, but since that's the outcome I prefer anyway, the loss won't bother me."

Trouble is, that ship has arguably already sailed. No matter how rapidly things go to hell, it will take many years before PLTR is profitable enough to justify its half-trillion dollar market cap.

Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by monocasa on Friday December 19, 2025 @02:59PM (#46330168)
It goes a bit deeper than that since they got funding in the wake of 9/11 and the requests for intelligence and investigative branches of government to do better and coalescing their information to prevent attacks.

So "panopticon that if it had been used properly, would have prevented the destruction of two towers" while ignoring the obvious "are we the baddies?"

Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by morkalork on Friday December 19, 2025 @08:36AM (#46325696)
Saw a joke about grok being a stand-in for Elon's children and had the realization he's the kind of father who would lobotomie and brainwipe his progeny for back-talk. Good thing he can only do that to their virtual stand-in and not some biological clones!
Re:Trained LLMs exclusively on pre-1913 texts by pwdisswordfishy on Thursday January 01, 2026 @10:50PM (#46461217)
This is a strange comment. It doesn't even count as unfalsifiable, just unsupported.

Elon Musk has actual children (lots, in fact). If we want to know what he "would" do, we can just look. We don't have to use our imaginations (or entertain the fanciful claims of prognosticators and soothsayers).