Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by NuclearPM on Thursday December 18, 2025 @11:04PM
(#46322154)
I don’t know why you quoted the addresses.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by RicoElectrico on Thursday December 18, 2025 @11:14PM
(#46322209)
Markdown habit.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by alias_neo on Friday December 19, 2025 @05:15AM
(#46324171)
Tell me you don't Markdown, without telling me you don't Markdown.
It's a developer thing, using backticks means the enclosed text is emphasised when rendered from Markdown.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by jameshart on Friday December 19, 2025 @07:27AM
(#46325084)
Backticks mark fixed width inline code, not emphasis.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by alias_neo on Friday December 19, 2025 @07:33AM
(#46325121)
I know what they do, it doesn't change the fact that we use them for emphasis.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by refulgentis on Saturday December 20, 2025 @01:24AM
(#46334031)
Chuckled when I saw the reasonable correct informative and perfectly polite answer…is the one in gray. Cheers.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by adastra22 on Friday December 19, 2025 @09:33AM
(#46326277)
Backticks long predate markdown.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by freedomben on Friday December 19, 2025 @10:11AM
(#46326695)
How dare someone not be a developer!
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by __MatrixMan__ on Friday December 19, 2025 @09:16AM
(#46326089)
It's polite to give parsers (human or otherwise) hints that they're about to encounter text which is now intended for a different kind of parser.
I recently forgot to surround my code in ``` and Gemini refused to help with it (I think I tripped a safety guardrail, it thought I was targeting it with an injection attack). Amusingly, the two ways to work around it were to fence off my code with backticks or to just respond to:
> I can't help you with that
With
> Why not?
After which it was then willing to help with the unquoted code. Presumably it then perceived it as some kind of philosophical puzzle rather than an attack.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by jlarocco on Friday December 19, 2025 @11:34AM
(#46327680)
It's disappointing to see people here use language like "perceived" for an LLM.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by __MatrixMan__ on Friday December 19, 2025 @11:46AM
(#46327890)
As a panpsychist I have no special esteem for an LLM's perceptive powers. I also anticipate that the planet perceives us as nuisance.
Re:Texas is suing all of the big TV makers for spying on wha...
by VTimofeenko on Saturday December 20, 2025 @05:42PM
(#46340341)
Fair question, it does look a bit jarring when not rendered. I write a lot of markdown and it's a very strong force of habit to use backticks to sort of highlight a technical term and turn it into a noun.
Similar to writing endash as a double hyphen.
When I read what I write, my eyes glance through backticks and maybe come back if I need to parse the inner term in more detail.