News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by illusive4080 on Saturday December 13, 2025 @04:04PM (#46258043)
Mullvad is the only VPN I will ever trust. Yet again they ace the test.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by cedws on Saturday December 13, 2025 @04:13PM (#46258124)
Not sure why you've been downvoted. Somebody protecting their business?
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by flumpcakes on Saturday December 13, 2025 @04:34PM (#46258314)
I also use Mullvad VPN exclusively for my VPN needs. The fact I can get 6 months of access with a scratch card bought from a store & my account is just a random integer number is an example of privacy by design: no email, no phone numbers, no credit cards. I don't even do anything illegal, I'd just rather have a (what I feel) trusted option when I want to browse the Internet anonymously.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by illusive4080 on Saturday December 13, 2025 @04:53PM (#46258496)
Can you buy those in US stores?

I’ve been paying for Mullvad with Monero for years. Love it

Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by phantom784 on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:06PM (#46258610)
Amazon, but that kind of defeats the point.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by buildbot on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:53PM (#46259021)
Buy amazon gift card in cash, setup new account, ship scratch card to locker? (Idk if they’d let you do that).

I think you can still mail them cash?

Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by phantom784 on Monday December 15, 2025 @07:19AM (#46273536)
Can an Amazon account be made anonymously? (I've never tried).
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by buildbot on Monday December 15, 2025 @10:12AM (#46275513)
I assume if all the inputs are anonymous you could? Like phone/email. Never tried either haha.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by flumpcakes on Sunday December 14, 2025 @07:05AM (#46262485)
It doesn't defeat the point in my threat model. No one in the position to log my traffic knows who I am other than my source IP address (which is already enough to link it back to me anyway). So let's take Mullvad at their word that they don't log anything, what's the threat now?

Maybe Amazon are x-raying the card numbers before shipping them out to customers, but that would require Mullvad giving up the card number -> account number -> account number traffic logs. Not much of a threat there.

Maybe all amazon orders are funnelled somewhere and they correlate the fact I bought a VPN card with my home address, and then correlate my bandwidth into Mullvad IPs (gained from my ISP logs) with data leaving Mullvad but that's all very unlikely and very circumstantial.

I'm also not doing anything illegal so perhaps my threat model/level is lower than the 'average' VPN user.

Anyway, not to be a shill but honestly I am just completely won over with how Mullvad do business. I know that a VPN does not make you automatically 'private'/'anonymous' but just the way they do business makes me happy.

Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by phantom784 on Monday December 15, 2025 @07:18AM (#46273530)
But then how is that more secure than just paying Mullvad directly? Either way, there's a record of "this person gave money to Mullvad".
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by flumpcakes on Saturday December 20, 2025 @10:11AM (#46336733)
Because the people who know who I am, and the people who know what I browse are different. If I paid directly to Mullvad they would know both.

The simple fact they go out of their way to buy their services in this way makes me believe them even more when they say they don't log user traffic, unlike other VPNs.

Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by gspr on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:21PM (#46258749)
You can even just randomly generate such an ID number, write it on a piece of paper and enclose it with cash in one of several currencies, and post it to them.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by drnick1 on Saturday December 13, 2025 @04:38PM (#46258348)
The best thing is that they accept crypto. I wouldn't want to pay for a VPN with a credit card in my name.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by hxtk on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:09PM (#46258638)
But you have to get money into your crypto wallet somehow, which makes it relatively easy to deanonymize for most users (serious crypto privacy enthusiasts could of course pay cash for their crypto or perhaps mine it themselves) if they're looking at your traffic specifically, but hard if you're only worried about bulk collection.

IMO the coolest privacy option they have is to literally mail them an envelope full of cash with just your account's cash payment ID.

Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by illusive4080 on Sunday December 14, 2025 @07:55PM (#46269004)
You can exchange common coins into Monero and Monero is fully private.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by jopsen on Saturday December 13, 2025 @05:26PM (#46258784)
> I wouldn't want to pay for a VPN with a credit card in my name.

Wow, you must be using the VPN for some seriously shady stuff.

Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by ssl-3 on Saturday December 13, 2025 @07:23PM (#46259619)
Back when I was doing that uber-shady business of torrenting, and this kind of VPN was much less-common than it is today, I paid for VPN access with crypto.

I'd gather a small amount of that up (however I did that), keep it in an offline wallet, and spend it on VPN service every now and then.

It just seemed like the right way to go about things.

(And then I lost that wallet, because of course I did, with about $14 worth of BTC in it. I didn't care enough at that time to see if I'd backed it up properly; I wasn't planning on using it for anything anymore anyway. That was in 2014 and those backups are waaaay gone now, but it'd be around $2k worth of BTC today -- plenty to buy some DDR5 RAM. Whoopsie-doodle!)

Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by vpShane on Saturday December 13, 2025 @07:26PM (#46259639)
Enough to buy like 512MB of DDR5 RAM maybe
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by ssl-3 on Saturday December 13, 2025 @10:10PM (#46260464)
...then I'll just have to learn how to get stuff done with 512MB of RAM.

(I'm sure that browsers like lynx still work just like they did in 2001, and that pine can still read mail. Shouldn't be a problem, right?)

Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by YouAreWRONGtoo on Sunday December 14, 2025 @03:53AM (#46261736)
links2 is still a work horse in 2025 for occasional debugging.
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by ssl-3 on Sunday December 14, 2025 @04:17AM (#46261841)
I know of links and have used it, but I don't think I've ever used links2.

Am I correct to assume that links2 is more of the same/better?

(Also: Your comment seems perfectly sane, but it was already marked as "flagged" by the time I saw it 18 minutes after it was submitted. I vouched for it.

But I wonder: Whose ruffles did you panty in order for your comments to land this way?)

[dead]
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by vpShane on Sunday December 14, 2025 @03:24PM (#46266490)
Naw you'll have to email dang and ask him they have a auto system, I got auto shadow banned once and had to email them, they said I didn't do anything wrong and then restored all my comments. I went like 3 months thinking nobody liked my comments enough to give me an up point. Worth reaching out about their auto mod is sensitive
Re:VPN location claims don't match real traffic exits by someNameIG on Saturday December 13, 2025 @06:06PM (#46259107)
What actual extra privacy does that add though? You still need to connect to them from your IP address, which can be traced back to you.