Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg
by eviks on Thursday November 27, 2025 @02:57AM
(#46066871)
What's unsustainable about it?
Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg
by paulddraper on Thursday November 27, 2025 @02:40PM
(#46072578)
I thought this was obvious, but you will be asked to evaluate every government/organization on their morales. So they enforce immigration laws, not enforce it, enforce improperly, do they support abortion, do they support the right side in the Middle East, do they have racist policies, do they not have anti-racist policies, do they limit freedom of speech, do they not limit free speech enough.
Every service has rules but are the rules clear and consistent enough that organizations can reliably use the service without worrying they’ll be terminated.
Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg
by eviks on Thursday November 27, 2025 @03:34PM
(#46073014)
> you will be asked to evaluate every government/organization on their morales
So what? Obviously you won't respond to all the permutations, so can draw only some red lines.
> without worrying they’ll be terminated
Yes, you can have some principles without increasing these concerns
Re:Migrating the main Zig repository from GitHub to Codeberg
by paulddraper on Thursday November 27, 2025 @05:01PM
(#46073595)
> Obviously you won't
That's what I meant by not scalable/sustainable.
> Putting aside GitHub’s relationship with ICE…
If you actual actually wanted to put that aside, you could have…put it aside.
(Plus it being weird on a substantive basis. Selectively blacklisting specific government agencies…that’s just not a sustainable approach.)