Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by JAlexoid on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @08:08PM
(#46052917)
> I've already archived all the videos I care about
That's quite literally what we call piracy.
Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by Dylan16807 on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @08:58PM
(#46053318)
What makes it different from VHS?
Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by JAlexoid on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @09:19PM
(#46053479)
It doesn't. Recording copyrighted material that has been broadcast is, in fact, copyright infringement.
Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by Dylan16807 on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @10:54PM
(#46054033)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v._Unive....
I don't know if you're making some edge case argument without elaborating, or if you're just being ridiculous.
Re:Someone at YouTube Needs Glasses: The Prophecy Has Been F...
by justinclift on Tuesday November 25, 2025 @11:09PM
(#46054110)
No, that's just a you thing.
Did I? Can you tell me where I made this deal? I navigated to YouTube.com, I don't see a contract, I don't see a place to sign or a hand to shake. Where is this bilateral agreement?
I think what you meant to say was, YouTube really very much wants me to watch their ads, and I don't care to, so I won't.
If your counter is that then YouTube will shut down, I say, oh well, I've already archived all the videos I care about, and someone else will replace them, or not, and either way life will go on.