News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by Aeolun on Friday November 07, 2025 @07:51PM (#45853058)
It’s just easier to do some things if they’re prohibited by law. If you don’t want children to smoke, not selling them ciggarettes is a great first step.
Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by raw_anon_1111 on Friday November 07, 2025 @08:05PM (#45853144)
All the statistics I’ve seen show that 25-30% of teenagers smoke weed.

It’s but the governments job to make you out not to be the bad guy to your kids.

Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by Aeolun on Saturday November 08, 2025 @03:58AM (#45855268)
It’s not their job, but if it needs to be done anyway I don’t mind them doing it for me.

And smoking weed is a hell of a lot healthier than social media.

Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by isaacremuant on Friday November 07, 2025 @10:26PM (#45853861)
Again, parent your kids. You clearly suck at it if you need the government to do it for you and you ruin society making it into an authoritian hellhole just because you have no backbone. Go live in an authoritian country where they ban everything instead of ruining what once where free countries.

Otherwise, don't have children if you lack the most basic of parenting skills.

Edit: you'd ask for bans on sex because you can't educate your children either, with the same line of reasoning. Religious like authoritianism.

Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by Aeolun on Saturday November 08, 2025 @03:56AM (#45855259)
You need to calm down. That’s a hell of a lot of personal attacks following a comment made in good faith.
Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by isaacremuant on Saturday November 08, 2025 @11:47AM (#45858039)
That's bullshit. When the comments are on some rep Vs dem issue where the tagline is correctly "my body my choice" suddenly it's all good but here, it's fine to keep trying to remove every bit of freedom because someone refuses to parent their children. Give me a break.

I'm calm. I'm just not taking the bullshit propaganda without calling it what it is.

You want to come for MY freedom. Don't be surprised if I push back.

Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by tomhow on Saturday November 08, 2025 @09:03AM (#45856726)
You can't comment like this on Hacker News, no matter what you're replying to. It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for. If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.
Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by isaacremuant on Saturday November 08, 2025 @11:45AM (#45858028)
If you are not doing this same thing to every comment trying to remove my freedom, which then will call me some label for disagreeing with COVID policies or whatever then I can't really take any of the guidelines seriously. I was here when it was all about segregating the ones who disagreed from life, even denying healthcare while still forcing them to pay taxes.

We're way past fake politeness when the discourse is always pro war, pro xenophobia for certain acceptable targets (e.g. Russia), pro disparaging certain alleged ideologies/parties (e.g. US republican).

2020-2021 happened and there's been no apology. Till then, the biased moderation rings hollow.

Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by tomhow on Saturday November 08, 2025 @10:23PM (#45862630)
I don't even know what your position or point is/was. We're don't moderate for/against any side or position. We just don't have time to take that into account. The guidelines apply regardless of what you're trying to say, and we routinely get these kinds of grandiose claims about our motivations, when the reality is far more boring: just preventing this site from turning into a flaming hellscape is a hard enough ask, without trying to complicate things further by promoting any particular ideology or narrative. For what it's worth I was here behind the scenes in 2020-21, and I know very well that plenty of effort was made to give all perspectives a fair hearing.

What we're asking for is quite simple. The guidelines are a condition of participating here. A sincere effort to observe them is expected from everyone, otherwise it's fine to choose not to participate.

Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by isaacremuant on Sunday November 09, 2025 @05:23PM (#45869790)
You realize that you're putting your "boring moderating reality" against the very real claims of goverments and people here to

- Remove people who didn't obey the house imprisonment rules during covid from society.

- Removing their jobs and ability to make a living

- Stealing their money

- Denying their ability to healthcare for any procedure

- Be put in camps permanently until they "complied" because "their body, our choice".

Once you factor that type of attack where no human rights nor Nuremberg trial result was respected, the faux civility and non bias rings absolutely hollow.

I'll try to attack their points with more faux civility like you want because staying silent is what got us there, but sometimes it may come up as more raw, since it's very easy to repeat state euphemisms to destroy people's lives but it's harder to counter permeated propaganda.

Edit: Reading my post again, it's absolutely on point. Hard to regret that. How would you write it?

Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by tomhow on Sunday November 09, 2025 @07:43PM (#45870854)
Please don't waste my time and yours by trying to turn this into a debate about pandemic policies. You don't know what I personally believed about any of it then or now, and it's nothing to do with the issue at hand.

There's no point having any guidelines or standards for the way this place operates if they change based on the particular issue of the day. The purpose of HN's guidelines is that we should be able discuss any topic, no matter how difficult, as long as we do so in the spirit of curiosity.

Outside HN there's no shortage of places where people can engage in ideological battle and vigorous protest, and I'm fully supportive of your right to do whatever you want to do to fight for the issues you believe in. Indeed, you're welcome to fight for what you believe in here too, but the way it's done on HN is through respectful conversation and persuasion, not aggression.

In your case, the first time I can see moderators having to remind you of the guidelines is 2014, so this issue goes back years before the pandemic. HN is only a place where people want to come to discuss important topics because other people make the effort to raise the standards rather than dragging them down. Please be one of the ones to make this place better, not worse, otherwise you're welcome to choose not to participate here.

Re:Denmark's government aims to ban access to social media f... by isaacremuant on Tuesday November 11, 2025 @12:26PM (#45890173)
Mmmm...

I'll make it short-ish:

- I'll say goodbye for now. You've given me pause and not because I buy into the fake politeness because I think that's BS (If you may grant me that expletive). - I think bringing 11 year old stuff (2014) without actually even putting the comment shows bad faith and an imbalance of power which tells me all I need to know not to engage further. You win. Point proven. You have power. I don't. Go pretend your world is fair and equitable but, if you have a lot of free time, do analyze how much you stopped calls for denying healthcare and putting people on camps the same way you stop someone telling others to parent their kids instead of removing their freedoms.

Au revoir and thanks for all the fish.

Edit: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33765437 holy dolphin. Really? Well, honorary deletion. Too much of a hassle. Way to ruin the dramatic exit with bureocracy.