News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China Has Added Forest the Size of Texas Since 1990 by ebbi on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @08:11PM (#45754803)
Not intending to make this political, but it's a relevant point to consider: we should also take into account the carbon footprint of all the bombs that were dropped by America and its proxies into the equation as well.

The environmental impact from these would be immense, I'd imagine.

Re:China Has Added Forest the Size of Texas Since 1990 by JBiserkov on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @08:17PM (#45754841)
I mean, just the nukes alone are incomprehensible, adding all the conventional munitions ... I'm out of words.

A Time-Lapse Map of Every Nuclear Explosion Since 1945 - by Isao Hashimoto https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY

1 second = 1 month

Re:China Has Added Forest the Size of Texas Since 1990 by LMYahooTFY on Thursday October 30, 2025 @01:47AM (#45756778)
All nuclear explosions themselves aren't even going to be statistically detectable.

IIRC from assessments of the US military's carbon footprint, cumulative footprint of nuclear weapons infrastructure is probably significantly less than .1%

There's a hundred other things to worry about first IMO.

Re:China Has Added Forest the Size of Texas Since 1990 by cman1444 on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @08:33PM (#45754992)
...do nuclear bombs release significant amounts of CO2? I didn't think they did.
Re:China Has Added Forest the Size of Texas Since 1990 by selcuka on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @08:50PM (#45755103)
Not the detonation itself (if we don't count the fires it may cause), but the total CO2 cost of nukes is high [1]:

> A bomb on its own does not emit carbon dioxide… It’s the infrastructure, the construction (cement emits a lot), fossil fuel use, manpower, consumption, supply chains etc that all contribute.

> A study published in the Energy & Environmental Science journal has documented that using 1/1000 of the total capacity of a full-scale nuclear war weaponry would induce 690 tonnes of CO2 to penetrate the earth’s atmosphere. This is more than the annual carbon footprint of the United Kingdom.

[1] https://lakenheathallianceforpeace.org.uk/carbon-footprint-o...

Re:China Has Added Forest the Size of Texas Since 1990 by chrneu on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @09:46PM (#45755513)
I feel it's worth pointing out that this is where some folks brains kind of break when the "cost" of a good is mentioned.

It's the massive infrastructure to do the things profitably at scale that is often the problem with much of the stuff we consume and use. Then the "cost" of the environmental damage down the line. The "intangibles" get split up.

Then we see these insane figures when these intangibles are all lumped together. This further disconnects people's brains from the real scale of what's going. Cuz our brains suck with big numbers.