Grammarly rebrands to 'Superhuman,' launches a new AI assistant

Re:Grammarly rebrands to 'Superhuman,' launches a new AI ass... by umanwizard on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @12:28PM (#45749145)

Are you a native English speaker? I can't think of a scenario where "superhuman" has negative connotations in American English. When we say someone has superhuman skill, or speed, or strength, it is always a positive thing.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Grammarly rebrands to 'Superhuman,' launches a new AI ass... by JohnFen on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @12:35PM (#45749277)

> Are you a native English speaker?

Yes, I am. Born and raised in the US.

There are instances where the term is used in a positive sense, yes, but those are limited in scope. "Superhuman strength" rather than just "superhuman".

"Superhuman" on its own is a term that has long been tightly associated with a wide variety of horrible things. Eugenics, for example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Grammarly rebrands to 'Superhuman,' launches a new AI ass... by umanwizard on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @05:41PM (#45753443)

I honestly think most American English speakers are not thinking about eugenics when they hear that term. I believe you when you say that it has those connotations for you but I think you are in a small minority.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Grammarly rebrands to 'Superhuman,' launches a new AI ass... by nxor on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @07:59PM (#45754718)

Without a doubt

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Grammarly rebrands to 'Superhuman,' launches a new AI ass... by jazzyjackson on Thursday October 30, 2025 @01:41AM (#45756753)

I like superhuman as an adjective, it implies some quality of a man is superhuman, but a superhuman as a standalone item is very frightening as it spells obsolescence for the rest of us ( I guess this is the plot of X-Men )

[ Parent | on HN ]