News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by ender7 on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @09:08PM (#4573698)
I think simply owning a car will be such a signal, similar to how owning a plane today is a mark of the super-wealthy. There will be "automotive Boeings" that produce cars for transportation companies, boutique shops that produce them for the wealthy, and not much in between.
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by olalonde on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @09:26PM (#4573758)
Yes, this is already the case in China and I suspect in many places around the world. In Shenzhen, taxis are very cheap and available within 100m around the clock pretty much everywhere. Even if you drive on average 1 hour per day which is very unusual in a high density city, owning a car would probably be more expensive then always taking the taxi. Yet, a lot of people still purchase cars (mostly luxury brands).
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by ricardobeat on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @09:44PM (#4573821)
I suspect this is the case almost everywhere in the world. A car's purchase price + gas + maintenance + taxes easily surpasses what you'd spend on taxis, even in a 5 year period. The keys to car ownership are convenience and the emotional aspects.
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by recursive on Thursday September 27, 2012 @02:49PM (#4582167)
Taxis don't go everywhere.