News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by waterlesscloud on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @08:56PM (#4573661)
I wonder, since cars also have a large social signalling aspect, at least in many societies.

I guess that can still be maintained, with various levels of luxury in taxis/rentals/however it works.

But then where will all that social signalling money go? I guess since it's mostly financed money anyway, that capital will have to seek other venues? Will consumer debt drop due to this? Or will something else pick up the slack?

Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by ender7 on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @09:08PM (#4573698)
I think simply owning a car will be such a signal, similar to how owning a plane today is a mark of the super-wealthy. There will be "automotive Boeings" that produce cars for transportation companies, boutique shops that produce them for the wealthy, and not much in between.
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by olalonde on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @09:26PM (#4573758)
Yes, this is already the case in China and I suspect in many places around the world. In Shenzhen, taxis are very cheap and available within 100m around the clock pretty much everywhere. Even if you drive on average 1 hour per day which is very unusual in a high density city, owning a car would probably be more expensive then always taking the taxi. Yet, a lot of people still purchase cars (mostly luxury brands).
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by ricardobeat on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @09:44PM (#4573821)
I suspect this is the case almost everywhere in the world. A car's purchase price + gas + maintenance + taxes easily surpasses what you'd spend on taxis, even in a 5 year period. The keys to car ownership are convenience and the emotional aspects.
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by recursive on Thursday September 27, 2012 @02:49PM (#4582167)
Taxis don't go everywhere.