News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by DannoHung on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @07:47PM (#4573405)
You don't think the novelty and risk associated with a fully automated system that's still in the experimental stages warrants any immediate caution?

Commercial planes have had autopilot for years, but they still require at least the pilot or co-pilot to sit behind the yoke.

When driverless cars have had a few million or billion hours without statistically significant incidents, I think we'll see the laws adapt to not even requiring a human fail-safe.

Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by neurotech1 on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @08:33PM (#4573579)
Actually, for commercial airliners its "worse". They require both a pilot and co-pilot behind the yoke, even in autopilot.

If an airliner is flown with less than two crew in the cockpit, even for a short period of time, the remaining pilot/co-pilot must wear a mask when flying above 25,000ft.

Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by waterlesscloud on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @09:00PM (#4573673)
Airliners used to have a third crew member, the Flight Engineer, but that job has been automated into oblivion.
Re:Driverless Cars Get Green Light in California by neurotech1 on Tuesday September 25, 2012 @10:15PM (#4573899)
A friend mentioned that non-scheduled (no passengers or commercial freight) flights in large aircraft (eg. 737) can still operate with a single-pilot and a rated flight engineer only. The pilot had to have her mask on (or clipped to the helmet) for the entire flight. This option is rarely done commercially, obviously.