Re:Valetudo: Cloud replacement for vacuum robots enabling lo...
by RobotToaster on Saturday October 25, 2025 @02:57AM
(#45701860)
Between this and grapheneOS, it seems everyone developing privacy software is borderline schizophrenic.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Valetudo: Cloud replacement for vacuum robots enabling lo...
by izacus on Saturday October 25, 2025 @06:27AM
(#45702702)
There was no need to bring GrapheneOS into this discussion, refrain from personal attacks please.
Re:Valetudo: Cloud replacement for vacuum robots enabling lo...
by cassianoleal on Saturday October 25, 2025 @06:42AM
(#45702754)
How is bringing GrapheneOS in personal?
Legit question, from a clueless person. Please be gentle! :)
Re:Valetudo: Cloud replacement for vacuum robots enabling lo...
by csnweb on Saturday October 25, 2025 @07:14AM
(#45702941)
Because the gp comment is not about grapheneos, but its creator and could be taken as insulting (considering none of them is likely to be actually schizophrene).
Re:Valetudo: Cloud replacement for vacuum robots enabling lo...
by cassianoleal on Sunday October 26, 2025 @11:18AM
(#45712589)
Oh ok I wasn't aware. I don't follow the Android scene and didn't know GrapheneOS was mostly a one-man show.
Re:Valetudo: Cloud replacement for vacuum robots enabling lo...
by izacus on Saturday October 25, 2025 @11:36AM
(#45704691)
Calling a person schizophrenic publicly is an insult, especially in an unrelated debate.
Re:Valetudo: Cloud replacement for vacuum robots enabling lo...
by cassianoleal on Sunday October 26, 2025 @11:23AM
(#45712633)
There's a few things to unpack here from my point-of-view.
First, I didn't see him calling any person schizophrenic. I don't follow the Android scene so to me GrapheneOS seems like an organisation rather than a person.
Second, he said borderline schizo.
Third, why is it an insult?