News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push? by ceejayoz on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @12:00PM (#45671143)
“People will die if we do x” is important, even if it hurts the fee-fees.

“It’s a mass gathering” arguments met the same resistance. Any argument would have.

Re:Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push? by mindslight on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @12:11PM (#45671326)
I'm with you on the idea that fascists will make any argument, and only value arguments as weapons rather than a good-faith attempt to figure things out. But I still believe there are people in the middle who are swayed by better arguments.

Maybe that's just my fatal flaw of being eternally hopeful that people will actually use their intelligence. But if this isn't the case, then what are we even doing?

(as for your actual argument, one can make the same argument that people will die without being able to get their fix of social church interaction. so then we're talking about numbers for hypotheticals, and right back to the dynamic where it's not even about logic)

Re:Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push? by viridian on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @04:10PM (#45674527)
Whatever your own feelings on the matter are, condescending to people with terms like "fee-fees" only engenders more conflict and outrage.

It's a fraction of a drop in an ocean of online hostility and malevolence, but is still a contributor nonetheless.