News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by ferguess_k on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:00PM (#45659210)
I heard that once you put up a website on the public internet, it would immediately gets attacked by all kinds of scanners or other worse things. Not sure if it's true as I'm not a web guy.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by rtldg on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:09PM (#45659371)
All IPv4 addresses, domains (maybe more so for recently-registered ones), and subdomains from Certificate Transparency Logs (for HTTPS certs) are all constantly checked and poked.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by pdntspa on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:05PM (#45659306)
Back in the day, I made the mistake of hooking up a fresh Windows XP (at least I think it was; pre-SP2) install directly to the internet. There was no firewall or NAT to protect me. The machine got pwned almost immediately.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by fragmede on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @10:11PM (#45664186)
It's still true!

> What happens if you connect Windows XP to the Internet in 2024?

https://youtu.be/6uSVVCmOH5w

Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by SoftTalker on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:03PM (#45659255)
Every public IPv4 address is port scanned multiple times a day.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by pdntspa on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:06PM (#45659316)
Watching my website's firewall and ssh logs show all the various hacking attempts is calming in the same way that watching waves crash on to the shore is.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by diggan on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:32PM (#45659714)
More like looking a thin net preventing mosquitoes from biting your skin, as there is some intention behind it, not just physics.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by ta1243 on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:04PM (#45659283)
Which really isn't a problem, unless you're being scanned so much your bandwidth is being overwhelmed. Certainly not the case for me, despite having port 80 and 443 open
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by tgv on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:13PM (#45659439)
I have a server that has a slow (5s) response to unknown pages, returns it as 200, and makes the next failing request even slower (for unauthenticated users). That seems to keep the number of requests limited. Perhaps I should just drop the connection after a certain number of requests.

BTW, quite a few of these port scanners are companies that offer to scan your ports for vulnerabilities. Temu pen testing, so to speak.

Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by eks391 on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @02:36PM (#45659762)
Do you configure this in your firewall? How can I replicate this?
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by fragmede on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @10:11PM (#45664190)
what firewall do you use?
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by tgv on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @10:12AM (#45669471)
It's in the "404" handler of the backend. It should be possible to write a caddy or nginx module for it.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by 1718627440 on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @05:44PM (#45662113)
Per day? per minute or second.
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by ferguess_k on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @01:43PM (#45672593)
Damn that's like Blood War in DND...
Re:Foreign hackers breached a US nuclear weapons plant via S... by aerostable_slug on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @03:26PM (#45660464)
IIRC Carnegie Mellon did a study years ago which showed that you could not unbox a new Windows machine, connect it "directly" to the Internet, and get it fully patched before it was pwned.