But the web, that's the fragile, centralized and weak point currently, and seems to be what you're referring to rather.
Maybe nitpicky, but I feel like it's important to distinguish between "the web" and "the internet".
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-57707530
That because people trust and hope blindly. They believe IT is for saving money? It isn’t. They coupled their cash registers onto an American cloud service. The couldn’t even pay in cash.
It usually gets worse, when not outages happens for some time. Because that increases blind trust.
The word "seems" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there.
Yes the Internet has stayed stable.
The Web, as defined by a bunch of servers running complex software, probably much less so.
Just the fact that it must necessarily be more complex means that it has more failure modes...
Now we have computers that shit themselves if DNS isn’t working, let alone LANs that can operate disconnected from the Internet as a whole.
And partially working or indicating this it works (when it doesn’t) is usually even worse.
Resilient systems work autonomously and can synchronize - but don't need to synchronize.
We're building weak infrastructure. A lot of stuff shall work locally and only optionally use the internet.