Re:Replacement.ai
by _DeadFred_ on Sunday October 19, 2025 @06:04PM
(#45638455)
Past performance is not indicative of future results.
Everyone keeps saying 'no need to worry, no need for society to plan, because jobs happened in the past'. Like we should just put all our hope on these magic future jobs appearing. Plenty of countries exist where there aren't enough jobs. We aren't exempt from that as if some magic jobfairy is looking out for us.
Re:Replacement.ai
by IgorPartola on Monday October 20, 2025 @09:15AM
(#45643530)
The difference I see is that when we automated car factories, etc. there were still loads of jobs that (a) were better done by a human AND (b) most humans could perform them. The issue is that if you eliminate all jobs that don’t require a PhD or equivalent, what happens to the people who are just not cut out to be nuclear physicists or biochemists, etc?
Re:Replacement.ai
by gaul_bladder on Monday October 20, 2025 @12:54PM
(#45646145)
> The issue is that if you eliminate all jobs that don’t require a PhD or equivalent, what happens to the people who are just not cut out to be nuclear physicists or biochemists, etc?
The divine right of the new kings will be born from social Darwinism
It won't if robots start driving trucks.