News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by layer8 on Sunday October 19, 2025 @11:49AM (#45635076)
That kind of defeatism isn’t helpful.

The present case also just seems malware easily detected by VirusTotal: https://old.reddit.com/r/xubuntu/comments/1oa43gt/xubuntuorg...

Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by chorlton2080 on Sunday October 19, 2025 @12:06PM (#45635257)
Look at all the mainstream scanners that failed to detect it!
Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by layer8 on Sunday October 19, 2025 @12:17PM (#45635365)
That’s pretty normal in my experience. That’s why you check with VirusTotal instead of a single “mainstream” scanner.
Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by rs186 on Sunday October 19, 2025 @01:39PM (#45636132)
In reality, if Microsoft Defender (Security or whatever the name is) can detect it (which does in this case), it means it is flagged on most target users' machine.

Of course, there are people who disable built-in security scanning and don't use another antivirus software, and that's on them.

Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by account42 on Monday October 20, 2025 @11:38AM (#45645151)
Unfortunately Defender also flags lots of non-malware open source software, which trains users to ignore it.
Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by rs186 on Monday October 20, 2025 @12:17PM (#45645623)
Example? Personally I have not run into a single such false positive for the past 10 years. Microsoft SmartScreen sometimes shows a warning for executables that are not digitally signed, but that's not Defender, and this is nowhere like flagging as a virus.
Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by akimbostrawman on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @04:58AM (#45653840)
qBittorrent which is a reputable and popular torrent client used to download linux isos, gets flagged and removed as "potentially unwanted applications" by windows defender.
Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by amelius on Sunday October 19, 2025 @11:54AM (#45635125)
Sticking-your-head-in-the-sand-ism isn't helpful either.

But nobody wants to talk about true security. For example, why does a Python module that renders progress bars (for example) need my full trust about what it does to the rest of my system? Etc.

Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by brookst on Sunday October 19, 2025 @01:09PM (#45635838)
What's the term for the fallacy that this problem can be ignored because that problem is so much worse?

Sorry, patient, why are we talking about setting your broken arm when you are genetically predisposed to cancer that's going to kill you anyway?

Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by zahlman on Sunday October 19, 2025 @03:41PM (#45637265)
It is the "fallacy of relative privation", for the record.
Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by amelius on Sunday October 19, 2025 @02:44PM (#45636789)
Nobody said the problem could be ignored ...
Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by zahlman on Sunday October 19, 2025 @03:41PM (#45637254)
> why does a Python module that renders progress bars (for example) need my full trust about what it does to the rest of my system?

tqdm is pure Python and available as a wheel. Or is this a general complaint about sandboxing others' code at runtime?

Re:Xubuntu.org Might Be Compromised by amelius on Sunday October 19, 2025 @05:31PM (#45638198)
General complaint. Has nothing to do with tqdm.