$ pwd
/tmp/zed/target/release
$ ls -lh ./zed
-rwx------ 2 john john 1.4G Aug 28 17:10 zed
--- $ dut zed/ | sort -h
598M 0B | | /- webrtc-sys-0a11149cbc74bc90
598M 0B | | | /- out
598M 0B | | |- webrtc-sys-090125d01b76a5e8
635M 160M | | /- s-hal7osjfce-1h7vhjb-4bdtrsk93m145adnqs17i9dxe
635M 160M | | |- project-06kh4lhaqfutk
641M 161M | | /- project-1ulvakop54j8y
641M 161M | | | /- s-hal5rdrth3-0j8nxqq-d0wsc7qnin39797z4e8ibhj4w
1.1G 1.1G | | /- zed-ed67419e7a858570
1.1G 1.1G | |- zed
1.3G 1.3G | /- zed-64b9faeefdf3b7df
1.3G 1.3G |- zed
1.4G 0B |- build
2.2G 0B | |- build
7.9G 1.4G /- deps
9.4G 0B |- release
14G 2.9G | |- incremental
19G 4.2G | /- deps
33G 0B /- debug
42G 0B /- target
42G 0B zed
Summary: $ du -h ./target/debug/deps/
20G ./target/debug/deps/
$ du -h ./target/release/deps/
8.0G ./target/release/deps/
$ du -h ./target/debug/zed
1.2G ./target/debug/zed
$ du -h ./target/release/zed
1.4G ./target/release/zed
This is on a whole new level of bloat; both with regarding to dependencies AND the resulting executable file. ls -lh /nix/store/63rdpgbzn7f1smh7688crcrpfsh833bb-zed-editor-0.199.10/bin/zeditor
-r-xr-xr-x. 2 root root 3.2M Jan 1 1970 /nix/store/63rdpgbzn7f1smh7688crcrpfsh833bb-zed-editor-0.199.10/bin/zeditor
EDIT: Ah, it was too good to be true :(
ls -lh /nix/store/52smrb1z8r4n71zx50xagkcdrhlga4y5-zed-editor-0.207.4/libexec/.zed-editor-wrapped
-r-xr-xr-x. 2 root root 337M Jan 1 1970 /nix/store/52smrb1z8r4n71zx50xagkcdrhlga4y5-zed-editor-0.207.4/libexec/.zed-editor-wrappedExtra weight also comes from webrtc, which nixpkgs dynamically links. So yeah, it's quite a large binary indeed.
$ strip --strip-all ./target/release/zed
$ du -h ./target/release/zed
261M ./target/release/zed
$ strip --strip-all ./target/debug/zed
$ du -h ./target/debug/zed
482M ./target/debug/zed
Correct. It is still embarrassing, in my opinion.To make matters worse, it takes several minutes for Zed's window to appear on a cold start, whereas VSCode launches almost instantly.
[1] I am trying to measure it as we speak but it is taking quite a long time.
That one is interesting. It's much quicker for me, even cold starts are below 1s, and subsequent startups are basically instant.
I wonder why though.
[1] I have not measured subsequent launches of VSCode though, but Zed is relatively pretty quick after the initial launch.
Unless by "compiled in", some in-lining of the C code into Rust codebase is meant.
[1] https://github.com/emacs-tree-sitter/tree-sitter-langs/relea...
Maybe something like this to figure out what directories to delete:
# With dut
find . -type f -name Cargo.toml -printf '%h\n' | sort -u | xargs -r -d '\n' -I{} dut -s {} | sort -h
# With du
find . -type f -name Cargo.toml -printf '%h\n' | sort -u | xargs -r du -sh | sort -h
I found "websocat" and "ripgrep". Thankfully I got rid of everything else. ripgrep $ cargo clean
Removed 3411 files, 1020.2MiB total
websocat $ cargo clean
Removed 1726 files, 820.7MiB total
That said, ripgrep itself is only 5.0M.Or the fact that there is incremental compilation artifacts...
And of course the amount of dependencies. A single project might depend on hundreds of crates (quite common), each compiled separately with its own build artifacts. sighs.
For what it's worth, the zed executable on Linux weighs 3.2 MB.
EDIT: Sorry, the nix store is too good at hiding things from me. It's actually around 337 MB plus webrtc-sys.