News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Claude Haiku 4.5 by senko on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @02:30PM (#45596644)
I've tried it on a test case for generating a simple SaaS web page (design + code).

Usually I'm using GPT-5-mini for that task. Haiku 4.5 runs 3x faster with roughly comparable results (I slightly prefer the GPT-5-mini output but may have just accustomed to it).

Re:Claude Haiku 4.5 by justinbaker84 on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @03:36PM (#45597361)
I don't understand why more people don't talk about how fast the models are. I see so much obsession with bechmark scores but speed of response is very important for day to day use.

I agree that the models from OpenAI and Google have much slower responses than the models from Anthropic. That makes a lot of them not practical for me.

Re:Claude Haiku 4.5 by brianwawok on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @07:39PM (#45599696)
If the prompt runs twice as fast but it takes an extra correction, it’s a worse output. I’d take 5 minute responses that are final.
Re:Claude Haiku 4.5 by gizmodo59 on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @10:30PM (#45600812)
I don’t agree that speed by itself is a big factor. It may target a certain audience but I don’t mind waiting for a correct output rather than too many turns with a faster model.
Re:Claude Haiku 4.5 by jstummbillig on Thursday October 16, 2025 @02:30AM (#45602077)
Well, it depends on what you do. If a model can produce a PR that is ready to merge (and another can't), waiting 5 minutes is fine.