News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by q3k on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @01:38PM (#45582717)
Should be easy to compare - sand down both the cheapo and a legit one (with a similar datecode) with fine sandpaper, clean with isoprop and shove under an optical microscope - you can then tell how similar/dissimilar the dies are, you don't even have to look for markings or anything super legible, or even sand them to the same metal layer.

Clones tend to be vastly different - different technology node, architecture, die size, etc. - that's because they are generally functional clones, not mask clones.

(also, as a general shoutout to the low tech sandpaper technique for exploratory work, here's a sanded down RP2350 thrown under a clapped out SEM: https://object.ceph-eu.hswaw.net/q3k-personal/484e7b33dbdbd9... https://object.ceph-eu.hswaw.net/q3k-personal/3290eef9b6b9ad... )

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by Hasz on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @02:40PM (#45583338)
I have done this a bunch of different times, mostly to resolve sourcing disputes. Dissolving in boiling sulphuric acid/nitric acid will make quick work of most epoxy packaging

IMO, I have mostly seen mislabeling, rebinning, and passing off obvious QC rejects.

example from many years ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6DfBuPwAAA

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by q3k on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @02:46PM (#45583388)
> Dissolving in boiling sulphuric acid/nitric acid will make quick work of most epoxy packaging

That's the better method of course (results wise), but it's not nearly as accessible, hence my recent evangelism of the virtues of 2000 grit sandpaper.

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by jacquesm on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @03:24PM (#45583745)
I like it. I've used sandpaper to solve some interesting problems in the past as well with great success. I suspect we are only seeing the beginnings here in a trend of high-tech applications of fine grit paper.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by Terr_ on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @03:39PM (#45583885)
I expect it's much easier to acquire fine sandpaper, yet my inner child yearns for laser decapping. (Or I suppose more than "decapping", depending on the depth.)
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by jacquesm on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @04:55PM (#45584746)
High power lasers are becoming more and more affordable. Laser ablation is definitely an option but you really want to have some proper fume extraction around that.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by BertoldVdb on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @06:02PM (#45585592)
Laser decapping will destroy the die, except if you have a rare package that does not mix glass in the epoxy.

You could still compare the internal structure of the package and bonding, but the die itself is mostly destroyed.

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by supportengineer on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @05:04PM (#45584858)
I'm off to build an MCP so AI can control the sandpaper
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by jacquesm on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @05:09PM (#45584930)
You may as well start off with one of these then:

https://phillipscorp.com/india/phillipsgrinding/phillips-sur...

All you need is a serial port and some G-codes.

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by doubleg72 on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @12:42AM (#45588158)
Surface grinders generally don’t use CNC, they are a simple machine.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by Dries007 on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @04:45AM (#45589700)
This is a fun playlist of a conversion of a manual machine to CNC:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLDlWKv7KIIr9rlCwZ9K43...

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by jacquesm on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @06:48AM (#45590496)
In the 1950's, yes. But these days they definitely are CNC based.

https://www.rooy.nl/en/areas-of-expertise/surface-grinding/

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by throwup238 on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @05:05PM (#45584867)
I prefer Japanese sharpening stones or those DMT diamond whetstones. It’s relative easy to 3d print a jig that converts a woodworking honing guide into an IC holder and you get a feel for how many passes to do very quickly before slowing down and checking each pass.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by q3k on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @07:28PM (#45586213)
That's a super interesting idea! I'll also have to try that.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by Tade0 on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @06:41PM (#45585912)
There was a sandpaper expert in that company associated with sour-tasting fruit which shall not be named. I believe you guys have met, though I think by that time he already pivoted to making the perfect cheesecake.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by kragen on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @10:46PM (#45587560)
I've heard that boiling epoxy in molten colophony for a few hours, like a long-cooked version of rosin potatoes, will also dissolve it. I haven't tried it myself. Colophony is much more expensive than sulfuric or nitric acid, but safer to handle (when not molten) and often easier to get.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by alwa on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @11:10PM (#45587706)
I did not know that. Pine rosin is such lovely and versatile stuff. And sure enough:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=pIpxawdUb4I&t=30m18s

…plus it smells much better; and, as you mention, it’s useful for potatoes too!

https://bittersoutherner.com/feature/2022/the-elusive-roots-...

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by kragen on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @11:54PM (#45587923)
These slides from the talk say it only takes 5–20 minutes. I'm not sure it will smell better when you heat epoxy to the specified 320–360°. I'm interested in hearing whether anyone else has tried this.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by piyh on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @01:03AM (#45588250)
I appreciate the effort, but the bar is already very high when you recommend a SEM in the same breath.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by q3k on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @06:07AM (#45590215)
The SEM was cheaper than an optical microscope or a fume hood though :).

(also I don't recommend a SEM in the first post, a cheapo USB 'microscope' will do, I just happen to have had SEM images on hand)

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by hinkley on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @05:44PM (#45585400)
<NileRed voice> …I wanted to look at this chip… so first I put it in a jar of hot nitric acid.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by cheschire on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @01:43PM (#45582757)
It may not even be a clone. As the author said, it could just as easily be production line items that were tested and found to be outside of spec tolerances and resold off-label.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by q3k on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @01:44PM (#45582768)
Well, that's the point of the experiment, to figure out if it's a clone or a reject :).
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by throwup238 on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @01:48PM (#45582800)
TI makes all their analog stuff in house so that's unlikely. That's far more common for fabless companies that send their parts off to an outside fab.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by cheschire on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @01:49PM (#45582820)
What does TI do with their out-of-tolerance products? Straight in the garbage?
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by throwup238 on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @01:57PM (#45582893)
Yes, though depending on the product line it may be binned into lower quality parts first. Remember though, the marginal cost of these chips is so small the packaging is usually more expensive than the silicon. They often get tested before the wafer is even sliced up so any waste is hardly worth mentioning until you get into modern processes with large error rates and huge chips like CPUs.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by 15155 on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @02:23PM (#45583138)
TI isn't patterning $10000 wafers at 3nm with massive chiplets and questionable yield, they are making mostly commodity ICs on cheaper processes - they can afford to discard rejects.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by Lerc on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @02:40PM (#45583332)
I think the implied question is do they discard, or do they destroy.

Discarded things tend to get lost. Lost things tend not stay in the Anduin forever.

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by pinkmuffinere on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @03:39PM (#45583886)
Lol I love the deep cut to LOTR! Took me a sec but then brought me so much joy. Viva la nerds!
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by LeifCarrotson on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @03:12PM (#45583624)
> "Discarded things tend to get lost. Lost things tend not to stay in the Anduin forever."

I'll have to put that on a warning label near our non-conforming-product containment shelf!

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by mikewarot on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @08:27PM (#45586642)
Not only that, leakage goes way up as you shrink the transistors, an ADC on a 3nm wafer would require a complete redesign, if it could be made to work at all.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by Arubis on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @03:24PM (#45583748)
Binned wafers are viable source material for photovoltaics.
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by fullstop on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @03:56PM (#45584061)
I don't know if we can ping people here, but this looks like something that would be right up Ken Shirriff's alley.

1. https://righto.com

Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by kens on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @04:50PM (#45584670)
I have enough projects already, so I'm staying quiet here :-)
Re:How bad can a $2.97 ADC be? by fullstop on Tuesday October 14, 2025 @04:54PM (#45584728)
I won't tell if you won't tell.