News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US opens Tesla probe after more crashes involving its "fu... by WJW on Thursday October 09, 2025 @10:41AM (#45528381)
At the moment it seems much more likely it will be significantly worse, statistically speaking, but because of massive lobbying it will be allowed anyway.
Re:US opens Tesla probe after more crashes involving its "fu... by DiscourseFan on Thursday October 09, 2025 @10:43AM (#45528417)
It is statistically safer for cars using LIDAR, like Waymo. Tesla’s system is sleeker, but involves far more human risk.
Re:US opens Tesla probe after more crashes involving its "fu... by lokar on Thursday October 09, 2025 @10:49AM (#45528495)
We don’t know that. All of the players, including Waymo give out only partial data that makes a sound analysis impossible.
Re:US opens Tesla probe after more crashes involving its "fu... by raxxorraxor on Thursday October 09, 2025 @10:53AM (#45528549)
Lidar has problems too. It works quite well if there is a limited number of cars that use it too. Of course if all of those were Waymos you could synchronize sensors to not interfere with each other.

Of course if that fails, perhaps they could use honking as backup sensor.

Re:US opens Tesla probe after more crashes involving its "fu... by vardump on Thursday October 09, 2025 @11:13AM (#45528842)
Lidar also destroys camera sensors. That might become a huge problem in the future.
Re:US opens Tesla probe after more crashes involving its "fu... by thrill on Thursday October 09, 2025 @11:20AM (#45528939)
Optical filters have been around for awhile, including anti-lasers for cameras, though only for a few years.
Re:US opens Tesla probe after more crashes involving its "fu... by fragmede on Friday October 10, 2025 @05:58PM (#45544269)
The difficulty isn't sensing, Lidar is overkill thanks to advancements in technology since the DARPA grand challenge.