News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by kevin_nisbet on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @11:14AM (#45517111)
Yup, even for smaller business stuff. For a non-profit I'm on the board of, the staff wanted a more useful printer/copy machine than just a store bought thing, it's a small office, so I said sure find something and let us know.

So I get a contract and am told it's been vetted and I should sign it. What I found was outrageous.

- If we cancelled for any reason, including if they just didn't do any of there terms in the contract, we owed the full price of the remaining contract immediately.

- The way they structured it was also as a rental, so we were paying full price for purchase of the equipment embedded into the term of the contract, but it was the vendors equipment, so if we cancelled we still paid them full price for the equipment, and they got to keep it.

- If there were any legal disputes, no matter which party was at fault, my side would pay for all the lawyers.

I said nope, can't do it. And my staff were pissed at me for like a year because everyone just signs those things.

Re:The email they shouldn't have read by xmprt on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @12:09PM (#45517716)
I get why your staff would be pissed because dealing with a crappy printer/scanner is the bane of a lot of office workers' existence... but they must have been able to find a better vendor or something off the shelf which supported the features they needed right? What special feature could they possibly offer to make them brave enough to put all those terms in their contract?
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by yobbo on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @12:19PM (#45517842)
They count on potential customers not reading the contracts, or being able to do math or research themselves.

Typical customers for these types of scams are small offices with no technical person in the loop.

Re:The email they shouldn't have read by trollbridge on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @12:24PM (#45517886)
Another example is the predatory, abusive contracts sold for merchant card processing.

Whereas our local bank will do it for $10 a month, interchange plus 0.15%, no contract. Versus fees of 3%, 3 year contract.

Re:The email they shouldn't have read by trollbridge on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @12:23PM (#45517874)
I’m also on a nonprofit board. They have an independent LLC and an independent nonprofit which signs contracts for various services like that, and then contracts with the “real” nonprofit to actually use the services. Was advised to set it up this way by an experienced nonprofit consultant.

We had to shred a bad contract (oddly enough, also for a printer / copier) and simply abandoned the LLC and declared it defunct. The service provider never has even showed up to pick up the printer. It was a pay per page contract where they unilaterally raised the price about 200% for no reason.

We also abandoned a water cooler and water cooler service after the vendor simply refused to answer our requests to end the service. (It’s $20 a month. There was no long term contract signed.) Apparently nonprofits are a target for this sort of thing, so we now don’t even mention we are a nonprofit and handle business relationships via the LLC.

It’s absurd things have become this way.

Re:The email they shouldn't have read by daheza on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @02:06PM (#45518920)
How are you setting up LLCs nowadays? I set one up through legalzoom and get charged an increasing amount each year (it increased $100) this year and I can't cancel / dissolve the charges via the UI. Even though I signed up online, I have to contact the state to dissolve the LLC then show legalzoom proof in order to cancel their yearly fee. Its pretty crazy.

Are there other better vendors for this kind of work out there?

Re:The email they shouldn't have read by mindcrime on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @03:00PM (#45519423)
Why do you need a "vendor" at all? Do the paperwork yourself and pay the $100 fee (or whatever it is in your chosen state), and Bob's yer uncle. At worst add in a one-time cost of $40 or so to buy a book like Nolo's LLC Handbook[1].

[1]: https://www.amazon.com/Nolos-LLC-Handbook-Agreements-Instruc...

Re:The email they shouldn't have read by charcircuit on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @07:45PM (#45521901)
Because you don't want to be your own registered agent.
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by trollbridge on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:01PM (#45521979)
This is out of date advice, primarily given by registered agents who often aren't actual attorneys.
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by charcircuit on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @09:01PM (#45522313)
Not everyone wants to have their location publicly available for the world to see. If you can be served a lawsuit, people can "serve" you a bunch of other things too.
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by mindcrime on Thursday October 09, 2025 @11:52AM (#45529410)
Fair enough. For my money, I wouldn't pay somebody else to do that, but I can see the appeal for some folks.
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by mindslight on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @07:47PM (#45521906)
You might want to use a registered agent rather than blasting someone's home address into all kinds of public records, or using an attorney who starts the billing clock to receive spam. And when you go for the more reasonably priced registered agents, it feels like a ticking clock until they start to enshittify.
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by trollbridge on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @08:00PM (#45521978)
I form them myself, which takes about 5 minutes on the Secretary of State's website. The only fee to the state is a one time formation fee. This is true in a variety of states.

I got this advice to do so from (a) the aforementioned nonprofit consultant and (b) an actual attorney, who does serve as a registered agent, for no fee. He is glad to do so since in the very rare event of a lawsuit, he'll be the one representing us. However, you could also just be your own registered agent if you have an office where people regularly work.

Note that I am not going out of my way to conceal the identity of the nonprofit board members / members of the LLC.