Re:Ladybird passes the Apple 90% threshold on web-platform-t...
by asadotzler on Monday October 06, 2025 @08:42PM
(#45498068)
It's not against the rules, but it is hostile to the web. Forking the web because a company is big enough to do so may sound just dandy to you, but to the rest of us who have spent decades working on interoperability it's a big middle finger.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ladybird passes the Apple 90% threshold on web-platform-t...
by nerdix on Monday October 06, 2025 @09:18PM
(#45498353)
Allowing Apple to have a veto on which features are allowed to be added to a browser is even more hostile to the web.
Re:Ladybird passes the Apple 90% threshold on web-platform-t...
by JimDabell on Monday October 06, 2025 @09:39PM
(#45498509)
Apple doesn’t have a veto. If two independent implementations are required for something to become a web standard, all Google have to do is convince anybody outside of Google to implement their specs, such as Mozilla – who Google pay billions of dollars to.
The problem with all of these new specifications is that Google can’t convince anybody to do this, no matter how much money they throw at them. That’s not an Apple veto stopping these things from becoming standards, that’s Google pushing shitty specs.