LLM Observability in the Wild – Why OpenTelemetry Should Be the Standard

Re:LLM Observability in the Wild – Why OpenTelemetry Should ... by lioeters on Saturday September 27, 2025 @07:08PM (#45400119)

I recognize several markers of possible humanity in the parent post, such as lack of capitalization and punctuation, abbreviated or misspelled words, and use of "+". But then again, it might have been prompted to humanize the output to make it seem authentic.

> 10+ pages long

> observability + evals

> Agin

> tools, inc time outs

> Thank god its been

> 6. tokens used, cost 7. reasoning,

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LLM Observability in the Wild – Why OpenTelemetry Should ... by mcny on Saturday September 27, 2025 @08:01PM (#45400442)

> > 6. tokens used, cost 7. reasoning,

Abruptly ending the response after a comma is perfection. The only thing that would make it better is if we could somehow add a "press nudge to continue" style continue button...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LLM Observability in the Wild – Why OpenTelemetry Should ... by ineedasername on Saturday September 27, 2025 @10:18PM (#45401199)

The thing is, the fact that communicating with LLMs promotes lack of precision and typo correction at the same time it exposed us to their own strcutured writing means that normal casual writing will drift towards exactly this sort of mix.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:LLM Observability in the Wild – Why OpenTelemetry Should ... by greesil on Saturday September 27, 2025 @10:48PM (#45401357)

I had to try. Hypotheses need data.

[ Parent | on HN ]