Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by RobotToaster on Sunday September 21, 2025 @09:07AM
(#45322382)
Such gagging orders should be illegal, they only serve to hide corporate malfeasance.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by dh2022 on Sunday September 21, 2025 @10:34AM
(#45323094)
Reporting crimes is protected by law: see the whistleblower act. What is being hidden here is some dirty laundry.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by martin-t on Sunday September 21, 2025 @11:08AM
(#45323423)
Not all immoral, abusive and exploitative acts are illegal. In fact, most are not, because companies have whole legal departments dedicated to figuring out just how they can exploit the system and other people without getting punished legally.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by nilamo on Sunday September 21, 2025 @12:46PM
(#45324379)
...which should also be totally ok? It's a company, not a person, it shouldn't have any kind of protections except for libel/slander.
If the laundry is dirty, it should be aired. No one is better off for hiding it, many people are worse for hiding it.
And a real person, saying real(true) things about an unreal(corporation) person, should always be ok.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by RobotToaster on Sunday September 21, 2025 @01:50PM
(#45325026)
Which is why I used the term malfeasance, which covers acts that aren't illegal but still immoral or otherwise against the public interest.