It was literally Palestinian land. European Zionists invaded and encouraged Arab Jewish mass immigration. The founding texts of Zionism, the Balfour Declaration and Nakba are all very well documented.

> European Zionists invaded

Invaded what state? Mandatory Palestine? It sounds like you're just referring to (mostly legal) Jewish immigration. Would you apply the same label to Arab immigrants such as Arafat, or is it only an invasion when Jews immigrate?

I’m talking about Nakba.

The nakba happened after seven Arab armies invaded the Jewish state. Not after Jews invaded any Arab state.

Typical Zionist lies:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakba

Which of these statements do you consider a lie:

  - The nakba happened in 1947. 
  - Arab armies invaded the Jewish state in 1947.
  - Jews did not invade any Arab state in 1947.
  - The Arab armies invaded the Jewish state in 1947.

  > It was literally Palestinian land.

When? So far as I know there has never been a Palestinian state, nor any independent Arab state, in the Holy Land.

  > European Zionists invaded and encouraged Arab Jewish mass immigration.

It was the Ottomans, yearning for tax money after losing a war to the Prussians, who in 1854 changed the tax laws to encourage immigration of all faiths to the holy land. Jerusalem was Jewish majority decades before British ever stepped foot on Holy Land soil.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_Jerus...

Jewish migration only became illegal in the Holy Land in 1936, when the Brits specifically made Jewish immigration illegal in response to the big Arab riot that year. Do you remember all the fuss a few years ago when Trump suggested that Muslims should not migrate to the United States? Would not a similar response be warranted for targeting Jewish migration?

  > The founding texts of Zionism, the Balfour Declaration and Nakba are all very well documented.

I do agree that the circumstances surrounding the founding of the state of Israel are very well documented. If you have something that contradicts what I've stated, I'd love to read it.