EU court rules nuclear energy is clean energy

Re:EU court rules nuclear energy is clean energy by bluefirebrand on Saturday September 13, 2025 @12:31AM (#45229313)

I don't think you should dismiss opposition to wind as mere NIMBYism

Windmills can be super loud and disruptive if they are built near you

Take a look around online and you can find people posting videos along the lines of "A windmill was built near my house, now every evening it's like a strobe light in here as the sun sets behind the windmill"

I wouldn't want to live anywhere near one myself

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU court rules nuclear energy is clean energy by Tade0 on Saturday September 13, 2025 @03:14AM (#45230011)

I went right up to a 2MW windmill once to test this hypothesis and all I could hear were cars on a road (100km/h speed limit) several hundred metres away.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU court rules nuclear energy is clean energy by procaryote on Saturday September 13, 2025 @02:47AM (#45229895)

Isn't that exactly what NIMBY means?

People want the power to stay on but they don't want the power generation built near them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU court rules nuclear energy is clean energy by bluefirebrand on Saturday September 13, 2025 @11:47AM (#45233020)

I think if something is built near you that materially lowers the quality of your life, being angry about it is not NIMBYism

I personally think NIMBYism is more along the lines of "this doesn't negatively impact my day to day life, but I'm worried it will lower my property value"

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:EU court rules nuclear energy is clean energy by procaryote on Sunday September 14, 2025 @02:37AM (#45237950)

I think that might be an uncommon definition, but language is fluid so who knows

[ Parent | on HN ]