News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tomorrow's Emoji, Today: Unicode 17.0 by paulryanrogers on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @06:10PM (#45190008)
Is it so bad to just click to increment the emoji regardless of the color/tone choice made by the first reaction?

I suppose if Slack were open to 3P clients you could override all the tone variants to use your choice. Maybe you can make a browser extension?

Re:Tomorrow's Emoji, Today: Unicode 17.0 by petesergeant on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @10:37PM (#45192480)
iirc Slack will remember your chosen skin tone and will increment it based on that, rather than the first colour chosen
Re:Tomorrow's Emoji, Today: Unicode 17.0 by deathanatos on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @02:46AM (#45194138)
> Is it so bad to just click to increment the emoji regardless of the color/tone choice made by the first reaction?

This is sort of what I feel like the parent was implying without outright saying it, too. But: that's not how Slack works. If the only reaction is an emoji of skin tone A (let's say its a dark skin toned thumbs up), and I click that dark skin toned thumbs up to also react, Slack adds a thumbs up with the skin tone configured in the user's settings (which I believe defaults to no skin tone), not the skin tone of the initial reaction.

Settings → Messages & media → Default Skin Tone

Re:Tomorrow's Emoji, Today: Unicode 17.0 by zyx321 on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @01:12PM (#45200754)
There's a big difference between "I wish Slack didn't have optional skin colors" vs "I wish Slack didn't have mandatory segregation"