Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer and most people poorer'

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by pizza on Monday September 08, 2025 @11:39PM (#45177135)

Isn't the difference between "capital -> labor -> capital" and "capital -> AI -> capital" (which is basically just "capital -> capital -> capital") that it's about the elimination of labor through its financialization? Not just that the poor get poorer, but from the POV of the rich that they don't even exist. (Conditional of course upon AI actually really being that much more productive than people and not dependent on them.)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by bitmasher9 on Monday September 08, 2025 @11:51PM (#45177192)

AI is just capital, you said it yourself. AI just adds more capital to the capital + labor = more capital equation. The more value capital brings in comparison to labor, the more value capital takes from the result compared to labor.

The issue is the increasing imbalance of capital being overvalued compared to labor, and how that has a negative impact on most individuals.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by DalasNoin on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @05:40AM (#45179734)

I guess pizza is saying that labor (in the sense of human labor/employment) is coming to an end. If AI + robotics just drives the economy capital self multiplies with out labor.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by bitmasher9 on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @08:42AM (#45181174)

Is labor actually going to zero?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by SubiculumCode on Monday September 08, 2025 @11:42PM (#45177148)

Well, when AI replaces us as consumers, the economy will truly leave us behind

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by js8 on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @01:37AM (#45177808)

Capitalism already replaces many citizens with consumers, leaving some behind. Citizens have a say in how money are spent, not just how much money they get. Consumers might get nominal choice in how much money they get, but the choice of how to spend is either forced (e.g. rent or healthcare) or is meaningless (e.g. which brand of car to drive instead of having public transport).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by eloisant on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @04:02AM (#45178939)

Don't worry, capitalism knows how to make a business out of poor people. Just look at Walmart, and credit cards.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by some_guy_nobel on Monday September 08, 2025 @11:57PM (#45177221)

Really makes you take a step back and wonder why Luigi was so celebrated. /s

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by visarga on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @02:29AM (#45178195)

You should also consider that people have AI too, everyone has AI, AI makes no difference in competition. Like having Linux, or Google Search - immensely useful but not a differential. So "capital -> AI -> capital" would just be the inferior option. Like building a product with minimal coding and just putting together open source packages, that anyone could replicate in a few hours.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by dns_snek on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @03:02AM (#45178486)

People don't "have" AI. People are being provided AI as a service by the corporations who invested billions into training it. If they ever make a leap where it can actually replace the workforce, it won't be provided for cheap like it is right now, and all the current open models will be obsolete.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Geoffrey Hinton: 'AI will make a few people much richer a... by jimbohn on Tuesday September 09, 2025 @05:51AM (#45179821)

I think that this kind of automation will lead to assets outweighting "real" work way more than they already do now, and I hope I am wrong.

[ Parent | on HN ]