Re:Tesla changes meaning of 'Full Self-Driving', gives up on...
by SOLAR_FIELDS on Saturday September 06, 2025 @07:59AM
(#45148510)
It is very true and worthwhile to point out that the only company deploying L4 at scale is using LIDAR. And that company is not Tesla
Re:Tesla changes meaning of 'Full Self-Driving', gives up on...
by UltraSane on Saturday September 06, 2025 @09:52AM
(#45149283)
The mental gymnastics Tesla fanboys use to explain this away are incredible.
Re:Tesla changes meaning of 'Full Self-Driving', gives up on...
by happyPersonR on Saturday September 06, 2025 @12:12PM
(#45150519)
The Tesla social media team actively used to post positive spin on comment threads. It wouldn’t surprise me if they have LLM doing this now.
Re:Tesla changes meaning of 'Full Self-Driving', gives up on...
by ModernMech on Saturday September 06, 2025 @10:01AM
(#45149334)
Researchers had this knowledge in 2007, when the only cars to finish the DARPA Urban challenge were equipped with Velodyne 3D LIDAR. Elon Musk sent us back a decade by using his platform to ignorantly convince everyone it was possible with just camera alone.
For anyone who understands sensor fusion and the Kalman filter, read this and ask yourself if you trust Elon Musk to direct the sensor strategy on your autonomous vehicle: https://www.threads.com/@mdsnprks/post/DN_FhFikyUE
For anyone wondering, to a sensors engineer the above tweet is like sayin 1 + 1 = 0 -- the truth (and science) is the exact opposite of what he's saying.
You can train a DL model to act like a LiDAR based on only camera inputs (the data collection is easy if you already have LiDAR cars driving around). If they could get this to work reliably, I'm sure the competition would do it and ditch the LiDAR, but they don't, so that tells us something.