News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by philip1209 on Sunday August 31, 2025 @11:57AM (#45084165)
I looked at our anthropic bill this week. Saw that one of our best engineers was spending $300/day on Claude. Leadership was psyched about it.
Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by pydry on Sunday August 31, 2025 @05:08PM (#45087105)
I was told that I wasnt using it enough by one arm of the company and that I was spending too much by another.

Meanwhile, try as I might I couldnt prevent it from being useless.

I know of no better metaphor than that of what it's like being a developer in 2025.

Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by merlincorey on Sunday August 31, 2025 @05:12PM (#45087139)
Claude is making $72k a year for a consistent $300/day spend.
Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by PhantomHour on Sunday August 31, 2025 @05:32PM (#45087299)
Bear in mind those are revenue figures, they're costing claude hundreds a day.

One imagines Leadership won't be so pleased after the inevitably price hike (which, given the margins software uses, is going to be in the 1-3 thousands a day) and the hype wears off enough for them to realize they're spending a full salary automating a partial FTE.

Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by ojosilva on Sunday August 31, 2025 @06:44PM (#45087759)
But, by the looks of things, models will be more efficient by then and a cheaper-to-run model will produce comparable output. At least that's how it's been with OSS models, or with the Openai api model. So maybe the inevitable price hike (or rate limiting) may lead to switching models / providers and the results being just as good.
Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by krainboltgreene on Sunday August 31, 2025 @10:04PM (#45088779)
> But, by the looks of things, models will be more efficient by then and a cheaper-to-run model will produce comparable output

So far there's negative evidence of this. Things are getting more expensive for similar outputs.

Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by etoxin on Monday September 01, 2025 @02:26AM (#45090019)
And this varies widely between models based on how they are told to reason.
Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by racc1337 on Monday September 01, 2025 @03:57AM (#45090557)
There is an interesting substack post about this. LLM costs are dropping 10x/year but the amount of tokens used have gone up like crazy https://open.substack.com/pub/ethanding/p/ai-subscriptions-g...
Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by protocolture on Sunday August 31, 2025 @10:56PM (#45089017)
Is he using it to code or just chatting up his AI girlfriend.
Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by sdesol on Monday September 01, 2025 @03:29AM (#45090361)
Joking aside, if he is one of the top developers in the company and if he is "actually" a good developer, when compared to others outside of the company, then I can see this bill.

The current feature that I'm working on, required 100 messages to finalize things and I would say the context window was around 35k - 50k per "chat completion". My model of choice is Gemini 2.5 Flash which has an input cost of $0.30/1M. Compare this to Sonnet which is $3.00/1M.

If the person was properly designing and instructing the LLM to build something advanced correctly, I can see the bill being quite high. I personally don't think you need to use Sonnet 99% of the time, but if somebody else is willing to pay the bill, why not.

Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by mlnj on Monday September 01, 2025 @05:05AM (#45090930)
Meanwhile an entire lake has evaporated in Northern Canada to deliver me a slightly different version of yet another payment options page.
Re:Older developers are down with the vibe coding vibe by protocolture on Monday September 01, 2025 @05:21AM (#45091009)
Awesome. That must be on the same planet where 300% of the worlds power goes to processing a single bitcoin transaction.