Re:Social media's next evolution: decentralized, open-source...
by dingnuts on Monday August 25, 2025 @10:49PM
(#45021751)
no, you get the subset your homeserver administrator decides to rehost
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Social media's next evolution: decentralized, open-source...
by thejohnconway on Monday August 25, 2025 @11:03PM
(#45021819)
I don't think that's a good way of stating it. You get the posts from the people anyone on your server follows. An admin can block or silence accounts, or run a relay, but these are edge cases.
Re:Social media's next evolution: decentralized, open-source...
by ekianjo on Monday August 25, 2025 @11:45PM
(#45022043)
An admin can decide to unfollow a bunch of instances and as a user you have no recourse.
Re:Social media's next evolution: decentralized, open-source...
by egypturnash on Tuesday August 26, 2025 @12:11AM
(#45022185)
you can say "hey could you refollow those instances"
you could throw more money into the instance's tip jar to make it easier for them to decide to rehost a larger part of the data firehose - that may not be the entire reason they defederated from an instance but it may be part of it
you could move to another instance whose admin's choices are more in line with yours
Re:Social media's next evolution: decentralized, open-source...
by LexiMax on Tuesday August 26, 2025 @12:20AM
(#45022238)
Other social networks can ban people I follow and I have no recourse.
Re:Social media's next evolution: decentralized, open-source...
by ekianjo on Tuesday August 26, 2025 @01:57AM
(#45022775)
True, so it's not an improvement. I guess it is even worse because when they unfollow an instance they may ban hundreds of users just because there are a few problematic ones.