Making Games in Go: 3 Months Without LLMs vs. 3 Days with LLMs

Re:Making Games in Go: 3 Months Without LLMs vs. 3 Days with... by marqueewinq on Monday August 25, 2025 @06:45AM (#45012437)

Personally, i don't think the coding part of game development was not a bottleneck.

Just try to implement, for example, a hexagon-based isometric game. There are no off-the-shelf implementations -- you'll need to redo the pan / zoom / click controls yourself, you'll need to implement the pathfinding, map layers, interface state machine etc etc etc

This is still not an easy task -- to build a somehow complicated game. If you're building a platformer -- sure, that's doable. Strategy/4X/RPG? That's different.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Making Games in Go: 3 Months Without LLMs vs. 3 Days with... by 0points on Monday August 25, 2025 @06:55AM (#45012487)

> Just try to implement, for example, a hexagon-based isometric game. There are no off-the-shelf implementations -- you'll need to redo the pan / zoom / click controls yourself, you'll need to implement the pathfinding, map layers, interface state machine etc etc etc

Sure there's off the shelf implementations.

Off the top of my head I would suggest starting with evaluating godot 4.

They have isometric view, pathfinding, and all of the rest you are mentioning.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Making Games in Go: 3 Months Without LLMs vs. 3 Days with... by marqueewinq on Monday August 25, 2025 @07:01AM (#45012514)

Sure they do -- but once you introduce at least one custom component (i.e. hexagon map), it's actually not straightforward, how to integrate it with the rest of the controls.

I can't say whether it's me who's stupid, or it's just not very easy to make good UI in game engines. I don't say that's not doable of course -- i'm just saying one would need to invest quite a bit of time to work out how to do this.

[ Parent | on HN ]