Re:Ban me at the IP level if you don't like me
by rollcat on Monday August 25, 2025 @07:28AM
(#45012679)
> I only pay $1 per month for my VPS, and even that piece of trash can handle 1000s of requests per second.
Depends on the computational cost per request. If you're serving static content from memory, 10k/s sounds easy. If you constantly have to calculate diffs across ranges of commits, I imagine a couple dozen can bring your box down.
Also: who's your webhost? $1/m sounds like a steal.
Re:Ban me at the IP level if you don't like me
by immibis on Monday August 25, 2025 @10:05AM
(#45013992)
You can sometimes find special (loss-leader) deals in this range on LowEndTalk. Typically you'll have to pay upfront for a block of one or two years.
Re:Ban me at the IP level if you don't like me
by TylerE on Monday August 25, 2025 @10:33AM
(#45014295)
It starting hitting endpoints that do lots of db thrashing, and it’s usually ones that are NOT common or recent so caching won’t save you.
Serving up a page that takes a few dozen db queries is a lot different than serving a static page.
Re:Ban me at the IP level if you don't like me
by TZubiri on Monday August 25, 2025 @07:27PM
(#45020463)
I'd wager a bet that there's a package.json lying somewhere that holds a lot of dependencies
Re:Ban me at the IP level if you don't like me
by micahdeath on Thursday August 28, 2025 @05:21PM
(#45057178)
We have some bots that use residential IP blocks (including TMobile, AT&T, Verizon, etc)... When they hit, it's 1 request per IP, but they use 1000 IPs easily. Then we don't see that IP again for a week or more.
I wonder what all those people are doing that their server can't handle the traffic. Wouldn't a simple IP-based rate limit be sufficient? I only pay $1 per month for my VPS, and even that piece of trash can handle 1000s of requests per second.