News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions. Parent comment

Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by geodel on Thursday August 21, 2025 @04:26PM (#44977642)
Not Engineer + AI = Now an Engineer

Thats the reason for high valuation of AI companies.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by ToucanLoucan on Thursday August 21, 2025 @04:30PM (#44977677)
Of all the things I would absolutely not trust the stock market to evaluate, "technical competence" is either near or at the top.

The people deciding how much OpenAI is worth would probably struggle to run first-time setup on an iPad.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by geodel on Thursday August 21, 2025 @09:58PM (#44980302)
I agree. Seems like people took my comment above as my opinion. It was supposed to be argument of Linkedin type AI hype generators.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by kentm on Thursday August 21, 2025 @11:27PM (#44980745)
It seemed like a normative statement, to be honest, so I misunderstood your point.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions by phyzome on Thursday August 21, 2025 @10:11PM (#44980364)
"Engineer" and "someone who can produce code" are not the same thing.
[ Parent | on HN ]