Re:Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active fe...
by Cushman on Saturday September 08, 2012 @10:38PM
(#4494722)
Uh huh.
Scientist: "As you can see here, we've demonstrated quantum teleportation across an unprecedented--"
Journalist: "Teleportation?! Like in Star Trek?"
Scientist: "Uh, no. *Quantum* teleportation is a different--"
Journalist: "So you didn't send anybody through a wormhole or anything?"
Scientist: "No. What we've demonstrated is the ability to--"
Journalist: "It just seems like a bit of a mistake to call it 'teleportation'."
Scientist: "Yes, I can see that now."
Re:Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active fe...
by zxtang on Saturday September 08, 2012 @11:18PM
(#4494791)
As always, there's an xkcd for that: http://xkcd.com/465/
Re:Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active fe...
by waterlesscloud on Saturday September 08, 2012 @11:23PM
(#4494799)
What do you imagine they thought teleportation meant when they appropriated it?
Re:Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active fe...
by chc on Saturday September 08, 2012 @10:01PM
(#4494668)
If it was a mistake, it wasn't dishonest. If it was dishonest, they were intentionally trying to deceive people.
Re:Quantum teleportation over 143 kilometres using active fe...
by marshray on Saturday September 08, 2012 @11:21PM
(#4494797)
Some of the claims people are making about the purported security advantages of quantum crypto are borderline dishonest, IMHO.
If scientists started calling walking "human teleportation" tomorrow, they'd be wrong in that too. The term "teleportation" had a very well-established meaning before they appropriated it.
Scientists can make mistakes, labeling this process "teleportation" was one of those mistakes.