This has been my experience. Just a bunch of ego stroking

Because ego's are fragile.

People might have envy for others success which would hurt their ego, but they are greedy enough to stroke someone else's ego, just so that they can get internet points or some "value creation" so that one day others can stroke their egos too.

Haven't the boomers more or less aged out of jobseeking at this point? Even the youngest of the Baby Boomers are around 60 and most of them are in their 70s.

If you want to see how true this is, visit r/linkedinlunatics[1] on Reddit.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/LinkedInLunatics/

There are a lot of boomers out there though, and you won’t reach them on TikTok.

The boomers have retired.

Gen X usually gets lumped in with boomers because they’re basically invisible. But Gen X DGAF either way.

That makes no sense and isn't relevant.

Boomer is now used to refer to a mindset and not just a generation.

Gen X very much became the boomers they hated. Half of the millennials I've known for years have become identical to the boomers they complained about 10 years ago. The millennials I know complain about zoomers being lazy and not pulling themselves up by their bootstraps and using strange lingo and being addicted to things their generation wouldn't have tolerated. And they things they like suck but the thing millennials liked were "good".

Basically, boomer is anyone older than you and acts like a grumpy or entitled old person. Zoomer is anyone younger than you who makes you uncomfortable with your age.

I'm a millennial and I think you summed it up pretty well.

The ironic thing is that boomers--the generation that threw off dress codes and produced the anti-war, civil rights, environmental, women's, and LBGT+ movements didn't have that mindset, but their parents and grandparents did.

are retiring

lots of phenomena that get incessantly overtheorized and misattributed these days can be simply explained by this

50-60% have retired. The rest soon will. In any case the claim I responded to is absurd.

Your second line is a non sequitur.

where are the non-boomers looking for jobs these days?

Retail - most of the good jobs are impossible to get. That's probably what I'll have to do when my current company finishes firing me with my disability. I have used a bunch of the regular job search boards - Dice, Ladders, Indeed, etc. I've also used LinkedIn, Glassdoor, Blind, Hackajob. The tech job market in my location seems abysmal.

gen-x here ... I'd say: anywhere/everywhere but LinkedIn. Be observant and creative.

Personally, I think that using any service that claim to deliver, for which in the real world I just can't find much supporting evidence and otherwise mostly claims from (direct or indirect) stakeholders (incl. users themselves), feels rather dumb. LinkedIn, and the ecosystem developed around it, has every incentive to be dishonest. In such cases, the burden of evidence that proves otherwise needs to be high. I've not seen that bar ever reached for LinkedIn; not even remotely. At least not where I live.

If my perspective leads to people claiming I'm "denying reality" (heard that a few times), it only suggests me how (practically or emotionally) invested some people apparently must be. To me it still looks and feels mostly like a huge fraud-machine. Nothing particularly new specific to LinkedIn though. Before LinkedIn, I've seen how recruitment and hiring agencies wiggled their way into the employment market, where I grew up in. It did not see it do any good. I'd say it shared plenty of characteristics with cancer.

It may take considerable effort, but I'd recommend doing your own due diligence and find potential employers yourself, to then approach them directly. Still works quite well, even today and without needing questionable middlemen/services.

Just my two cents; mileage may vary.

> its just a gathering of pretentious people.

Tell us more about HN...

Yea agree, same issue here.