News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How to Rig Elections [video] by dylan604 on Thursday August 14, 2025 @04:49PM (#44905547)
If Kavanaugh has become a verb, shouldn't Garland'd be a thing too when the Senate denies POTUS his constitutional right?
Re:How to Rig Elections [video] by delichon on Thursday August 14, 2025 @04:58PM (#44905615)
Since Garland didn't even get to a vote, it wasn't necessary to Kavanaugh (or Bork) him to the same degree. Abe Fortus got denied a vote via filibuster in '68, so you could say that Merrick Garland was Fortused.
Re:How to Rig Elections [video] by dylan604 on Thursday August 14, 2025 @05:30PM (#44905934)
But a filibuster is an accepted way for the minority to fight back. That's not the same thing as making up a new rule and denying a vote because it's a lame duck year. To equate the two is just strained logic at best.
Re:How to Rig Elections [video] by FergusArgyll on Thursday August 14, 2025 @05:08PM (#44905714)
Borked was the original
Re:How to Rig Elections [video] by robterrell on Thursday August 14, 2025 @05:32PM (#44905952)
This is the correct answer. More memorable and better number of syllables. Although I'm sure he wasn't the first either.
Re:How to Rig Elections [video] by edoceo on Thursday August 14, 2025 @08:23PM (#44907304)
TIL; I'd always used it for broken/stopped working but I looked it up - neat!

> Origin 1980s: from the name of Robert Bork (1927–2012), an American judge whose nomination to the Supreme Court (1987) was rejected following unfavorable publicity for his allegedly extreme views.