MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices

Re:MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices by wredcoll on Saturday August 09, 2025 @04:45PM (#44850026)

> It "somehow works" isn't engineering.

But it sure is fast.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices by _kb on Saturday August 09, 2025 @08:05PM (#44851545)

Move faster and break more things.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices by HighGoldstein on Sunday August 10, 2025 @05:50AM (#44854034)

Does this mean moving fastest would break infinitely many things?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices by mewpmewp2 on Sunday August 10, 2025 @06:04AM (#44854094)

Well if you think about it, if you do things infinitely fast, there's still infinitely many things that are broken about a theoretical feature set.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices by Henchman21 on Sunday August 10, 2025 @12:11PM (#44856143)

Everything is already broken. Can we maybe stop breaking stuff and start fixing whats been broken?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices by drweevil on Saturday August 09, 2025 @07:04PM (#44851193)

It somehow works, until it doesn't. That's when the pain starts.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices by jay_kyburz on Saturday August 09, 2025 @11:20PM (#44852526)

Like Capitalism, or even Democracy :)

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:MCP's Disregard for 40 Years of RPC Best Practices by whateveracct on Sunday August 10, 2025 @08:02PM (#44859580)

For some definition of "fast" haha

[ Parent | on HN ]