News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked. Parent comment

Re:Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked by miltonlost on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @09:53AM (#44812074)
"just someone dancing" I bet they say, thinking "porn" is only hardcore penetration while ignoring/forgetting Girls Gone Wild's entire conceit.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked by Cartoxy on Wednesday August 06, 2025 @10:16AM (#44812348)
The norm is moving. People likely seen more naked then many of there ancestors would have combined. Let alone Solidcenter smut.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked by 0x457 on Friday August 08, 2025 @12:23PM (#44838821)
Well, "porn" has a very loose definition and varies country by country. IMO it's either nudity (but remember free the nipple movement when you try to define nudity) and/or sexual act usually involving penetration.

Anyway, anyone dancing in a thong isn't even soft-core pornography in my book. Still morally wrong tho in this context.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Grok generates fake Taylor Swift nudes without being asked by ttemPumpinRary on Friday August 08, 2025 @12:32PM (#44838929)
Victorian ankle showing -> porn

Female moderator showing the weather to be wet soon -> porn

screen unplugged (censored but still) -> porn

[ Parent | on HN ]